GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-2J25-8CWQ-VGVC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-05 18:31 – Updated: 2025-11-24 21:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/fpu: Fix NULL dereference in avx512_status()

Problem

With CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU enabled, reading /proc/[kthread]/arch_status causes a warning and a NULL pointer dereference.

This is because the AVX-512 timestamp code uses x86_task_fpu() but doesn't check it for NULL. CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU addles that function for kernel threads (PF_KTHREAD specifically), making it return NULL.

The point of the warning was to ensure that kernel threads only access task->fpu after going through kernel_fpu_begin()/_end(). Note: all kernel tasks exposed in /proc have a valid task->fpu.

Solution

One option is to silence the warning and check for NULL from x86_task_fpu(). However, that warning is fairly fresh and seems like a defense against misuse of the FPU state in kernel threads.

Instead, stop outputting AVX-512_elapsed_ms for kernel threads altogether. The data was garbage anyway because avx512_timestamp is only updated for user threads, not kernel threads.

If anyone ever wants to track kernel thread AVX-512 use, they can come back later and do it properly, separate from this bug fix.

[ dhansen: mostly rewrite changelog ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38689"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-04T16:15:37Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/fpu: Fix NULL dereference in avx512_status()\n\nProblem\n-------\nWith CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU enabled, reading /proc/[kthread]/arch_status\ncauses a warning and a NULL pointer dereference.\n\nThis is because the AVX-512 timestamp code uses x86_task_fpu() but\ndoesn\u0027t check it for NULL. CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU addles that function\nfor kernel threads (PF_KTHREAD specifically), making it return NULL.\n\nThe point of the warning was to ensure that kernel threads only access\ntask-\u003efpu after going through kernel_fpu_begin()/_end(). Note: all\nkernel tasks exposed in /proc have a valid task-\u003efpu.\n\nSolution\n--------\nOne option is to silence the warning and check for NULL from\nx86_task_fpu(). However, that warning is fairly fresh and seems like a\ndefense against misuse of the FPU state in kernel threads.\n\nInstead, stop outputting AVX-512_elapsed_ms for kernel threads\naltogether. The data was garbage anyway because avx512_timestamp is\nonly updated for user threads, not kernel threads.\n\nIf anyone ever wants to track kernel thread AVX-512 use, they can come\nback later and do it properly, separate from this bug fix.\n\n[ dhansen: mostly rewrite changelog ]",
  "id": "GHSA-2j25-8cwq-vgvc",
  "modified": "2025-11-24T21:30:56Z",
  "published": "2025-09-05T18:31:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38689"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ca887e81095b99d890a8878841f36f4920181e6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31cd31c9e17ece125aad27259501a2af69ccb020"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…