GHSA-2CGV-28VR-RV6J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-04 17:24 – Updated: 2026-02-17 22:00
VLAI
Summary
libcrux incorrectly calculates on aarch64
Details

On platforms without the core::arch::aarch64::vxarq_u64 intrinsic, an unverified fallback in libcrux-intrinsics v0.0.3 passed incorrect arguments and produced wrong results. This corrupted SHA-3 digests and caused libcrux-ml-kem and libcrux-ml-dsa to sample incorrectly, yielding incorrect shared secrets and invalid signatures.

The issue has been fixed in v0.0.4.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "libcrux-intrinsics"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.3"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.0.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.0.3"
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "libcrux-ml-kem"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.3"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.0.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.0.3"
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "libcrux-ml-dsa"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.3"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.0.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.0.3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-04T17:24:23Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "On platforms without the `core::arch::aarch64::vxarq_u64` intrinsic, an unverified fallback in `libcrux-intrinsics` v0.0.3\npassed incorrect arguments and produced wrong results. This corrupted SHA-3 digests and caused `libcrux-ml-kem` and\n`libcrux-ml-dsa` to sample incorrectly, yielding incorrect shared secrets and invalid signatures.\n\nThe issue has been fixed in v0.0.4.",
  "id": "GHSA-2cgv-28vr-rv6j",
  "modified": "2026-02-17T22:00:42Z",
  "published": "2025-12-04T17:24:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/cryspen/libcrux/issues/1220"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/cryspen/libcrux/pull/1222"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/cryspen/libcrux/commit/8d10f45631afd1d93fabb2278dbb388a075b5608"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/cryspen/libcrux"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0133.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "libcrux incorrectly calculates on aarch64"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.