GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-2C64-VMV2-HGFC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-20 22:48 – Updated: 2025-11-27 08:34
VLAI
Summary
OpenFGA Improper Policy Enforcement
Details

Overview

OpenFGA v1.4.0 to v1.11.0 (openfga-0.1.34 <= Helm chart <= openfga-0.2.48, v.1.4.0 <= docker <= v.1.11.0) are vulnerable to improper policy enforcement when certain Check and ListObject calls are executed.

Am I Affected?

You are affected by this vulnerability if you meet the following preconditions: - You are using OpenFGA v1.4.0 to v1.11.0 - The model has a a relation directly assignable by a type bound pubic access with condition - The same relation is not assignable by a type bound public access without condition - You have a type assigned for the same relation that is a type bound public access without condition

Fix

Upgrade to v1.11.1. This upgrade is backwards compatible.

Workaround

None

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/openfga/openfga"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.11.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-64751"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-285"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-20T22:48:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-21T02:15:43Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Overview\nOpenFGA v1.4.0 to v1.11.0  (openfga-0.1.34 \u003c= Helm chart \u003c= openfga-0.2.48, v.1.4.0 \u003c= docker \u003c= v.1.11.0) are vulnerable to improper policy enforcement when certain Check and ListObject calls are executed.\n\n### Am I Affected?\nYou are affected by this vulnerability if you meet the following preconditions:\n- You are using OpenFGA v1.4.0 to v1.11.0\n- The model has a a relation directly assignable by a [type bound pubic access](https://openfga.dev/docs/concepts#what-is-type-bound-public-access) with [condition](https://openfga.dev/docs/modeling/conditions)\n- The same relation is not assignable by a type bound public access without condition\n- You have a type assigned for the same relation that is a type bound public access without condition\n\n\n### Fix\nUpgrade to v1.11.1. This upgrade is backwards compatible.\n\n### Workaround\nNone",
  "id": "GHSA-2c64-vmv2-hgfc",
  "modified": "2025-11-27T08:34:55Z",
  "published": "2025-11-20T22:48:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/security/advisories/GHSA-2c64-vmv2-hgfc"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64751"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openfga/openfga/releases/tag/v1.11.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenFGA Improper Policy Enforcement"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…