GHSA-28W8-QVWW-F539
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-13 18:30 – Updated: 2026-10-13 18:30For XSA-308 logic was introduced, as VMX VMEntry checks do not like the exact combination of state which occurs when #DB in intercepted, Single Stepping is active, and blocked by STI/MovSS is active, despite this being a legitimate state to be in. The resulting VMEntry failure is fatal to the guest.
Sadly there is another special sub-case of the above, with branch tracing enabled. In that case the prior adjustment would still cause a VMentry failure, as before fatal to the guest.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-79611"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-13T16:17:23Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "For XSA-308 logic was introduced, as VMX VMEntry checks do not like the\nexact combination of state which occurs when #DB in intercepted, Single\nStepping is active, and blocked by STI/MovSS is active, despite this being\na legitimate state to be in. The resulting VMEntry failure is fatal to\nthe guest.\n\nSadly there is another special sub-case of the above, with branch tracing\nenabled. In that case the prior adjustment would still cause a VMentry\nfailure, as before fatal to the guest.",
"id": "GHSA-28w8-qvww-f539",
"modified": "2026-10-13T18:30:52Z",
"published": "2026-10-13T18:30:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-79611"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-518.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/10/13/7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-518.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.