GHSA-26R5-RG9X-853C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-12 00:31 – Updated: 2026-08-12 00:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smp: Make CSD lock acquisition atomic for debug mode
Commit b0473dcd4b1d ("smp: Improve smp_call_function_single() CSD-lock diagnostics") changed smp_call_function_single() so that, when CSD lock debugging is enabled, async !wait calls use the destination CPU csd_data. That improves diagnostics, but it also removes the single-writer property that made the old csd_lock() safe: multiple CPUs can now prepare the same destination CPU CSD concurrently.
csd_lock() currently waits for CSD_FLAG_LOCK to clear and then sets the bit with a non-atomic read-modify-write. Two senders can both see an unlocked CSD, set the bit, overwrite the callback fields, and enqueue the same llist node. Re-adding a node that is already the queue head can make node->next point to itself, leaving the target CPU stuck walking call_single_queue. Later synchronous work, such as a TLB shootdown, can then remain queued and trigger soft-lockup warnings or panics.
Keep the single csd_lock() implementation, but when CSD lock debugging is enabled, acquire CSD_FLAG_LOCK with try_cmpxchg_acquire(). This makes the destination CPU CSD a real atomic lock in the only configuration where it can be shared by multiple remote senders, while preserving the existing non-debug fast path.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-68438"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-12T00:17:44Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmp: Make CSD lock acquisition atomic for debug mode\n\nCommit b0473dcd4b1d (\"smp: Improve smp_call_function_single()\nCSD-lock diagnostics\") changed smp_call_function_single() so that,\nwhen CSD lock debugging is enabled, async !wait calls use the\ndestination CPU csd_data. That improves diagnostics, but it also removes\nthe single-writer property that made the old csd_lock() safe: multiple\nCPUs can now prepare the same destination CPU CSD concurrently.\n\ncsd_lock() currently waits for CSD_FLAG_LOCK to clear and then sets the\nbit with a non-atomic read-modify-write. Two senders can both see an\nunlocked CSD, set the bit, overwrite the callback fields, and enqueue\nthe same llist node. Re-adding a node that is already the queue head can\nmake node-\u003enext point to itself, leaving the target CPU stuck walking\ncall_single_queue. Later synchronous work, such as a TLB shootdown, can\nthen remain queued and trigger soft-lockup warnings or panics.\n\nKeep the single csd_lock() implementation, but when CSD lock debugging is\nenabled, acquire CSD_FLAG_LOCK with try_cmpxchg_acquire(). This makes the\ndestination CPU CSD a real atomic lock in the only configuration where it\ncan be shared by multiple remote senders, while preserving the existing\nnon-debug fast path.",
"id": "GHSA-26r5-rg9x-853c",
"modified": "2026-08-12T00:31:12Z",
"published": "2026-08-12T00:31:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68438"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/282d220bae5fbfc90cf0e3d5b5e42c00ad79f989"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35551efb155e3b83445a6c3f66cb498d5efc182c"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.