GHSA-24M2-RCHH-H2MX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-08 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-08 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/v3d: Reject empty multisync extension to prevent infinite loop

v3d_get_extensions() walks a userspace-provided singly-linked list of ioctl extensions without any bound on the chain length. A local user can craft a self-referential extension (ext->next == &ext) with zero in_sync_count and out_sync_count, which bypasses the existing duplicate- extension guard:

if (se->in_sync_count || se->out_sync_count)
        return -EINVAL;

The guard never fires because v3d_get_multisync_post_deps() returns immediately when count is zero, leaving both fields at zero on every iteration. The result is an infinite loop in kernel context, blocking the calling thread and pegging a CPU core indefinitely.

Fix this by rejecting a multisync extension where both in_sync_count and out_sync_count are zero in v3d_get_multisync_submit_deps(). An empty multisync carries no synchronization information and serves no useful purpose, so returning -EINVAL for such an extension is the correct defense against this attack vector.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-46314"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-835"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-08T17:16:50Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/v3d: Reject empty multisync extension to prevent infinite loop\n\nv3d_get_extensions() walks a userspace-provided singly-linked list of\nioctl extensions without any bound on the chain length. A local user\ncan craft a self-referential extension (ext-\u003enext == \u0026ext) with zero\nin_sync_count and out_sync_count, which bypasses the existing duplicate-\nextension guard:\n\n    if (se-\u003ein_sync_count || se-\u003eout_sync_count)\n            return -EINVAL;\n\nThe guard never fires because v3d_get_multisync_post_deps() returns\nimmediately when count is zero, leaving both fields at zero on every\niteration. The result is an infinite loop in kernel context, blocking\nthe calling thread and pegging a CPU core indefinitely.\n\nFix this by rejecting a multisync extension where both in_sync_count\nand out_sync_count are zero in v3d_get_multisync_submit_deps(). An\nempty multisync carries no synchronization information and serves no\nuseful purpose, so returning -EINVAL for such an extension is the\ncorrect defense against this attack vector.",
  "id": "GHSA-24m2-rchh-h2mx",
  "modified": "2026-07-08T15:31:37Z",
  "published": "2026-06-08T18:31:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46314"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/309abbddeca0c12714721928a819ef45e5710998"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4fa42a249e8cd6ed17aea04e5695b6e9001f2433"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c5164781cb388d219d8f49fa0f0b04cf86ad544"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb44d589bf3148e13452185a6e772a7efbf2d684"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.