GHSA-246P-F5JM-57HH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:01 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:46IBM solidDB 4.5.x before 4.5.182, 6.0.x before 6.0.1069, 6.1.x and 6.3.x before 6.3 FP8 (aka 6.3.49), and 6.5.x before 6.5 FP4 (aka 6.5.0.4) does not properly handle the (1) rpc_test_svc_readwrite and (2) rpc_test_svc_done commands, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a crafted command.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-1208"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-05-05T02:39:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM solidDB 4.5.x before 4.5.182, 6.0.x before 6.0.1069, 6.1.x and 6.3.x before 6.3 FP8 (aka 6.3.49), and 6.5.x before 6.5 FP4 (aka 6.5.0.4) does not properly handle the (1) rpc_test_svc_readwrite and (2) rpc_test_svc_done commands, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a crafted command.",
"id": "GHSA-246p-f5jm-57hh",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:46:37Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:01:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1208"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/67019"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/44380"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1025451"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21496106"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47584"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-11-142"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.