GHSA-232G-622W-PRRG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-18 15:30 – Updated: 2026-10-18 15:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: options: fix uninit-value in mptcp_write_data_fin
When sending a DATA_FIN without data, and because the DATA_FIN occupies 1 octet of the connection-level sequence space [1], it is then required to add a DSS mapping with specific values.
If the checksum has been negotiated, it also needs to be computed, and included in the outgoing packet, and thus the initial csum data needs to be reset to 0 as well. This is no longer the case since commit cfcceb7a39fc ("tcp: shrink per-packet memset in __tcp_transmit_skb()"), because the whole ext_copy structure is no longer zeroed by default.
This seems to be the only case where use_map is changed and set afterwards, so initialising the csum field only in this case, along with other fields for this specific case.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-98438"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-18T15:16:53Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: options: fix uninit-value in mptcp_write_data_fin\n\nWhen sending a DATA_FIN without data, and because the DATA_FIN occupies\n1 octet of the connection-level sequence space [1], it is then required\nto add a DSS mapping with specific values.\n\nIf the checksum has been negotiated, it also needs to be computed, and\nincluded in the outgoing packet, and thus the initial csum data needs to\nbe reset to 0 as well. This is no longer the case since commit\ncfcceb7a39fc (\"tcp: shrink per-packet memset in __tcp_transmit_skb()\"),\nbecause the whole ext_copy structure is no longer zeroed by default.\n\nThis seems to be the only case where use_map is changed and set\nafterwards, so initialising the csum field only in this case, along with\nother fields for this specific case.",
"id": "GHSA-232g-622w-prrg",
"modified": "2026-10-18T15:30:32Z",
"published": "2026-10-18T15:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98438"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a682067dd7b9dce6b94a0a05661dcc921446402"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b110f1dd6cb6a9930503354a01a315e0a821eaa7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.