GHSA-2275-RPF5-XV8H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-01 06:30 – Updated: 2023-02-08 22:40
VLAI
Summary
is-http2 vulnerable to Improper Input Validation
Details
All versions of the package is-http2 are vulnerable to Command Injection due to missing input sanitization or other checks, and sandboxes being employed to the isH2 function.
Severity
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "is-http2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-25906"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-78"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-02-02T17:13:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-01T05:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "All versions of the package is-http2 are vulnerable to Command Injection due to missing input sanitization or other checks, and sandboxes being employed to the isH2 function.",
"id": "GHSA-2275-rpf5-xv8h",
"modified": "2023-02-08T22:40:04Z",
"published": "2023-02-01T06:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25906"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/stefanjudis/is-http2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/stefanjudis/is-http2/blob/master/index.js#L23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/stefanjudis/is-http2/blob/master/index.js%23L23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-ISHTTP2-3153878"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "is-http2 vulnerable to Improper Input Validation"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…