GCVE-1988-2026-0197
Vulnerability from gna-1988 – Published: 2026-09-08 07:57 – Updated: 2026-09-08 07:57
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Re: Multiple Security Misconfigurations and Customer Enumeration Exposure in Convercent Whistleblowing Platform (EQS Group)
Summary
Hi,
the vulnerabilities are no longer considered eligible for CVE tracking, despite being real, independently discovered,
responsibly disclosed, and acknowledged by the vendor.
CVE IDs *can* be assigned for SaaS or similarly "cloud only" software. For a period of time, there was a restriction
that only the provider could make or request such an assignment. But the current CVE rules remove this restriction:
4.2.3 CNAs MUST NOT consider the type of technology (e.g., cloud, on-premises, artificial intelligence, machine
learning) as the sole basis for determining assignment.
It would have been acceptable (even preferred) to leave CVE-2025-34411 and CVE-2025-34412 published and identify them
as affecting an "exclusively-hosted-service:"
5.1.11.1 (A CVE Record) MUST use the “exclusively-hosted-service” tag when all known Products listed in the CVE Record
exist only as fully hosted services. If the Vulnerability affects both hosted services and on-premises Products, then
this tag MUST NOT be used.
Rules: https://www.cve.org/resourcessupport/allresources/cnarules
Regards,
- Art
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Severity
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
5 references
Impacted products
Relationships
reference
GCVE-1988-2026-0197 (this record)
- related CVE-2025-34411
- related CVE-2025-34412
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "unknown",
"vendor": "unknown",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "unknown"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Art Manion via Fulldisclosure"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hi,\n\nthe vulnerabilities are no longer considered eligible for CVE tracking, despite being real, independently discovered, \nresponsibly disclosed, and acknowledged by the vendor.\nCVE IDs *can* be assigned for SaaS or similarly \"cloud only\" software. For a period of time, there was a restriction \nthat only the provider could make or request such an assignment. But the current CVE rules remove this restriction:\n\n4.2.3 CNAs MUST NOT consider the type of technology (e.g., cloud, on-premises, artificial intelligence, machine \nlearning) as the sole basis for determining assignment.\n\nIt would have been acceptable (even preferred) to leave CVE-2025-34411 and CVE-2025-34412 published and identify them \nas affecting an \"exclusively-hosted-service:\"\n\n5.1.11.1 (A CVE Record) MUST use the \u201cexclusively-hosted-service\u201d tag when all known Products listed in the CVE Record \nexist only as fully hosted services. If the Vulnerability affects both hosted services and on-premises Products, then \nthis tag MUST NOT be used.\n\nRules: https://www.cve.org/resourcessupport/allresources/cnarules\n\nRegards,\n\n - Art\n\n\n_______________________________________________\nSent through the Full Disclosure mailing list\nhttps://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure\nWeb Archives \u0026 RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T07:57:41Z",
"orgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
"shortName": "VULNARCHIVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Jan/17"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jan/17"
},
{
"url": "https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure"
},
{
"url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cve.org/resourcessupport/allresources/cnarules"
}
],
"source": {
"defect": [
"https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jan/17"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Re: Multiple Security Misconfigurations and Customer Enumeration Exposure in Convercent Whistleblowing Platform (EQS Group)",
"x_gcve": [
{
"recordType": "reference",
"relationships": [
{
"destId": "CVE-2025-34411",
"type": "related"
},
{
"destId": "CVE-2025-34412",
"type": "related"
}
],
"vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0197",
"x_vulnarchive": {
"archiveUrl": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Jan/17",
"automated": true,
"contentSha256": "d187d28957b37a8564bdb303fce20e7735192773826c8c243907db2920484f09",
"evidenceScore": 5,
"messageId": "",
"originalUrl": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jan/17",
"policy": "vulnarchive-1",
"sourceFormat": "text/html",
"sourcePublishedAt": "2026-01-08T18:26:44Z"
}
},
{
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "gcve-1988-2026-0197"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
"assignerShortName": "VULNARCHIVE",
"datePublished": "2026-09-08T07:57:41Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T07:57:41Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0197"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…