GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GCVE-1988-2026-0195

Vulnerability from gna-1988 – Published: 2026-09-08 07:57 – Updated: 2026-09-08 07:57
VLAI
Title
Multiple Security Misconfigurations and Customer Enumeration Exposure in Convercent Whistleblowing Platform (EQS Group)
Summary
UPDATE: Following the publication of these vulnerabilities and the subsequent CVE assignments, the CVE identifiers have now been revoked. The vendor (EQS Group) contacted the CVE Program (via a CNA) and disputed the records, stating that the affected product is an exclusively hosted SaaS platform with no customer-managed deployment or versioning. Based on this argument, the CVE Program concluded that CVE assignment is “not a suitable solution for vulnerability identification” in this case, as customers do not take direct action to apply fixes. In other words, because the service is centrally hosted and patched at the provider’s discretion, the vulnerabilities are no longer considered eligible for CVE tracking, despite being real, independently discovered, responsibly disclosed, and acknowledged by the vendor. The vendor has stated that fixes are being implemented and that private customer notifications will be issued internally. While remediation is of course welcome, this outcome highlights a broader issue: vulnerabilities in SaaS platforms can effectively disappear from public vulnerability tracking, simply because the deployment model removes user agency, a model that arguably incentivizes security through obscurity, rather than transparency. The technical findings remain valid. This update is shared purely for accuracy and record-keeping. On Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 4:40 PM <yuffie.kisaragi () atomicmail io [yuffie.kisaragi () atomicmail io]> wrote: UPDATE: The reported vulnerabilities have now been assigned CVE identifiers: CVE-2025-34411: https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34411 [https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34411] CVE-2025-34412: https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34412 [https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34412] _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Severity
No CVSS data available.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
unknown unknown Affected: unknown
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Relationships
reference GCVE-1988-2026-0195 (this record)

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "unknown",
          "vendor": "unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unknown"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Yuffie Kisaragi via Fulldisclosure"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "UPDATE:\n\n\n\n\nFollowing the publication of these vulnerabilities and the subsequent CVE\nassignments, the CVE identifiers have now been revoked.\n\n\n\n\nThe vendor (EQS Group) contacted the CVE Program (via a CNA) and\u00a0disputed the\nrecords, stating that the affected product is an exclusively hosted SaaS\nplatform with no customer-managed deployment or versioning. Based on this\nargument, the CVE Program concluded that CVE assignment is \u201cnot a suitable\nsolution for vulnerability identification\u201d in this case, as customers do not\ntake direct action to apply fixes.\n\n\n\n\nIn other words, because the service is centrally hosted and patched at the\nprovider\u2019s discretion, the vulnerabilities are no longer considered eligible for\nCVE tracking, despite being real, independently discovered, responsibly\ndisclosed, and acknowledged by the vendor.\n\nThe vendor has stated that fixes are being implemented and that private customer\nnotifications will be issued internally.\n\n\n\n\nWhile remediation is of course welcome, this outcome highlights a broader issue:\nvulnerabilities in SaaS platforms can effectively disappear from public\nvulnerability tracking, simply because the deployment model removes user agency,\na model that arguably incentivizes security through obscurity, rather than\ntransparency.\n\n\n\n\nThe technical findings remain valid.\n\n\n\n\nThis update is shared purely for accuracy and record-keeping.\n\nOn Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 4:40 PM \u003cyuffie.kisaragi () atomicmail io\n[yuffie.kisaragi () atomicmail io]\u003e wrote:\nUPDATE:\n\n\nThe reported vulnerabilities have now been assigned CVE identifiers:\nCVE-2025-34411: https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34411\n[https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34411]\nCVE-2025-34412: https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34412\n[https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34412]\n_______________________________________________\nSent through the Full Disclosure mailing list\nhttps://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure\nWeb Archives \u0026 RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T07:57:41Z",
        "orgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
        "shortName": "VULNARCHIVE"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Jan/4"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jan/4"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34411"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-34412"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "defect": [
          "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jan/4"
        ],
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Multiple Security Misconfigurations and Customer Enumeration Exposure in Convercent Whistleblowing Platform (EQS Group)",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "recordType": "reference",
          "relationships": [
            {
              "destId": "CVE-2025-34411",
              "type": "related"
            },
            {
              "destId": "CVE-2025-34412",
              "type": "related"
            }
          ],
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0195",
          "x_vulnarchive": {
            "archiveUrl": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Jan/4",
            "automated": true,
            "contentSha256": "f09c92da4c5a7aeb2581a72015cc49071ab139218b207121c182b6d3bc9d070c",
            "evidenceScore": 4,
            "messageId": "",
            "originalUrl": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jan/4",
            "policy": "vulnarchive-1",
            "sourceFormat": "text/html",
            "sourcePublishedAt": "2026-01-04T22:01:57Z"
          }
        },
        {
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "gcve-1988-2026-0195"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
    "assignerShortName": "VULNARCHIVE",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-08T07:57:41Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T07:57:41Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0195"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…