GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GCVE-1988-2026-0011

Vulnerability from gna-1988 – Published: 2026-09-07 06:42 – Updated: 2026-09-09 13:03
VLAI
Title
Flextype v1.0.0-alpha.3 NULL access_token Authentication Bypass
Summary
Description Flextype CMS v1.0.0-alpha.3 contains an authentication validation vulnerability in the API request-processing functionality. API endpoints may declare access_token as a required parameter, but the required-parameter validation only verifies that the corresponding key exists in the supplied request data. Authentication verification is subsequently performed inside an isset($data ['access_token']) condition. In PHP, isset() returns false when a key exists but its value is null. An attacker can therefore supply "access_token": null, satisfying the required-parameter existence check while causing the subsequent access-token verification logic to be skipped. Testing confirmed that a protected Entries API operation accepted an access_token value of null and successfully created an entry. Impact An remote attacker can bypass the access_token authentication requirement for affected API endpoints. The resulting impact depends on the functionality exposed by the affected endpoint. Where the bypass provides access to entry creation, modification, query, or other privileged API functionality, it may also remove the authentication prerequisite from vulnerabilities reachable through those endpoints. The public API token requirement should be considered separately from the bypassed access_token security control. DetailsRequired Parameter Validation Flextype combines query and request-body parameters and verifies required parameters by checking only whether the required key occurs within the resulting array: $data = array_merge($queryData, $bodyData); $dataTest = true; foreach ($options['params'] as $key => $value) { if (in_array($value, array_keys($data))) { continue; } $dataTest = false; } Consequently, a request containing: { "access_token": null } satisfies the parameter-presence requirement because the access_token key exists. Authentication Verification Access-token validation is subsequently conditional upon PHP's isset(): if (isset($data['access_token'])) { if (! isset($tokenData['hashed_access_token'])) { return $this->getStatusCodeMessage(401); } if (! verifyTokenHash($data['access_token'], $tokenData['hashed_access_token'])) { return $this->getStatusCodeMessage(401); } } For a PHP array containing an access_token key whose value is null: isset($data['access_token']) evaluates to false. The authentication verification block is therefore skipped. Proof of Concept The following request supplies the required access_token parameter with a JSON null value: POST /api/v1/entries HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:18086 Content-Type: application/json {"token":"lab-token","access_token":null,"id":"auth-null-proof","data":{"title":"AUTH_NULL_BYPASS_PROOF"}} Flextype accepted the request: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Host: 127.0.0.1:18086 Content-Type: application/json;charset=UTF-8 {"title":"AUTH_NULL_BYPASS_PROOF","published_by":"","created_by":"","uuid":"514b6f5a-dc16-4572-9c16-8ac4a17250f0","content":"","slug":"auth-null-proof","published_at":1788143638,"modified_at":1788143638,"created_at":1788143638,"routable":true,"visibility":"visible","id":"auth-null-proof"} The successful creation of auth-null-proof demonstrates that supplying a null access token bypasses the access-token verification performed by the API authentication logic. Root Cause The vulnerability results from inconsistent validation of required parameters. The first validation considers a parameter present when its key exists: in_array($value, array_keys($data)) while authentication is conditional upon: isset($data['access_token']) These operations have different behavior for null values. A JSON value of: "access_token": null therefore satisfies the first condition while preventing execution of the second. Ron Edgerson Vulnerability Researcher & Exploit Developer CVE Research | Binary Exploitation | Application & Systems Security Responsible Disclosure β€’ Proof-of-Concept Development 🌐 https://github.com/ob1sec πŸ”— https://www.linkedin.com/in/ronedgerson1 <https://linkedin.com/in/yourhandle> _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Severity
No CVSS data available.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Flextype Flextype Affected: unknown
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Credits

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Flextype",
          "vendor": "Flextype",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unknown"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Ron E"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Description\n\nFlextype CMS v1.0.0-alpha.3 contains an authentication validation\nvulnerability in the API request-processing functionality. API endpoints\nmay declare access_token as a required parameter, but the\nrequired-parameter validation only verifies that the corresponding key\nexists in the supplied request data.\n\nAuthentication verification is subsequently performed inside an isset($data\n[\u0027access_token\u0027]) condition. In PHP, isset() returns false when a key\nexists but its value is null.\n\nAn attacker can therefore supply \"access_token\": null, satisfying the\nrequired-parameter existence check while causing the subsequent\naccess-token verification logic to be skipped.\n\nTesting confirmed that a protected Entries API operation accepted an\naccess_token value of null and successfully created an entry.\nImpact\n\nAn remote attacker can bypass the access_token authentication requirement\nfor affected API endpoints.\n\nThe resulting impact depends on the functionality exposed by the affected\nendpoint. Where the bypass provides access to entry creation, modification,\nquery, or other privileged API functionality, it may also remove the\nauthentication prerequisite from vulnerabilities reachable through those\nendpoints.\n\nThe public API token requirement should be considered separately from the\nbypassed access_token security control.\nDetailsRequired Parameter Validation\n\nFlextype combines query and request-body parameters and verifies required\nparameters by checking only whether the required key occurs within the\nresulting array:\n\n$data = array_merge($queryData, $bodyData);\n\n$dataTest = true;\n\nforeach ($options[\u0027params\u0027] as $key =\u003e $value) {\n    if (in_array($value, array_keys($data))) {\n        continue;\n    }\n\n    $dataTest = false;\n}\n\nConsequently, a request containing:\n\n{\n    \"access_token\": null\n}\n\nsatisfies the parameter-presence requirement because the access_token key\nexists.\nAuthentication Verification\n\nAccess-token validation is subsequently conditional upon PHP\u0027s isset():\n\nif (isset($data[\u0027access_token\u0027])) {\n    if (! isset($tokenData[\u0027hashed_access_token\u0027])) {\n        return $this-\u003egetStatusCodeMessage(401);\n    }\n\n    if (! verifyTokenHash($data[\u0027access_token\u0027],\n$tokenData[\u0027hashed_access_token\u0027])) {\n        return $this-\u003egetStatusCodeMessage(401);\n    }\n}\n\nFor a PHP array containing an access_token key whose value is null:\n\nisset($data[\u0027access_token\u0027])\n\nevaluates to false.\n\nThe authentication verification block is therefore skipped.\nProof of Concept\n\nThe following request supplies the required access_token parameter with a\nJSON null value:\n\nPOST /api/v1/entries HTTP/1.1\nHost: 127.0.0.1:18086\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\"token\":\"lab-token\",\"access_token\":null,\"id\":\"auth-null-proof\",\"data\":{\"title\":\"AUTH_NULL_BYPASS_PROOF\"}}\n\nFlextype accepted the request:\n\nHTTP/1.1 200 OK\nHost: 127.0.0.1:18086\nContent-Type: application/json;charset=UTF-8\n\n{\"title\":\"AUTH_NULL_BYPASS_PROOF\",\"published_by\":\"\",\"created_by\":\"\",\"uuid\":\"514b6f5a-dc16-4572-9c16-8ac4a17250f0\",\"content\":\"\",\"slug\":\"auth-null-proof\",\"published_at\":1788143638,\"modified_at\":1788143638,\"created_at\":1788143638,\"routable\":true,\"visibility\":\"visible\",\"id\":\"auth-null-proof\"}\n\nThe successful creation of auth-null-proof demonstrates that supplying a\nnull access token bypasses the access-token verification performed by the\nAPI authentication logic.\nRoot Cause\n\nThe vulnerability results from inconsistent validation of required\nparameters.\n\nThe first validation considers a parameter present when its key exists:\n\nin_array($value, array_keys($data))\n\nwhile authentication is conditional upon:\n\nisset($data[\u0027access_token\u0027])\n\nThese operations have different behavior for null values.\n\nA JSON value of:\n\n\"access_token\": null\n\ntherefore satisfies the first condition while preventing execution of the\nsecond.\n\nRon Edgerson\nVulnerability Researcher \u0026 Exploit Developer\n\nCVE Research | Binary Exploitation | Application \u0026 Systems Security\nResponsible Disclosure \u2022 Proof-of-Concept Development\n\n\ud83c\udf10 https://github.com/ob1sec\n\ud83d\udd17 https://www.linkedin.com/in/ronedgerson1\n\u003chttps://linkedin.com/in/yourhandle\u003e\n_______________________________________________\nSent through the Full Disclosure mailing list\nhttps://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure\nWeb Archives \u0026 RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-09T13:03:57Z",
        "orgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
        "shortName": "VULNARCHIVE"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description",
            "exploit"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Sep/23"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Sep/23"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ob1sec"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://linkedin.com/in/yourhandle"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/ronedgerson1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "defect": [
          "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Sep/23"
        ],
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Flextype v1.0.0-alpha.3 NULL access_token Authentication Bypass",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "relationships": [],
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0011",
          "x_vulnarchive": {
            "archiveUrl": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Sep/23",
            "automated": true,
            "contentSha256": "efe9de737ca56dbcd80c23ad730f7fd8c9523cc4918fd3fb3e884a81fe122cb6",
            "evidenceScore": 9,
            "messageId": "",
            "originalUrl": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Sep/23",
            "policy": "vulnarchive-1",
            "sourceFormat": "text/html",
            "sourcePublishedAt": "2026-08-31T02:50:46Z"
          }
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
    "assignerShortName": "VULNARCHIVE",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-07T06:42:13Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-09T13:03:57Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0011"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…