GCVE-1-2026-20112 (CVE-2026-60125)
Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-07-08 13:36 – Updated: 2026-07-08 13:36
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
importModule function in MISP ignores per-organisation import module restrictions
Summary
MISP’s importModule() path used getEnabledModule() to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by getEnabledModules(). As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via Plugin.Import_<module>_restrict could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name.
This could allow unauthorised access to restricted import-module functionality and, depending on the module and the user’s event permissions, may allow unauthorised import or modification of event data through a module that should have been unavailable to the user’s organisation.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/0ed79b4d3177f… | patch |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "misp",
"repo": "https://github.com/misp/misp",
"vendor": "misp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.5.42",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Sami Mokaddem"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Berk Polat"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) aka Claudy"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eMISP\u2019s \u003ccode\u003eimportModule()\u003c/code\u003e path used \u003ccode\u003egetEnabledModule()\u003c/code\u003e to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by \u003ccode\u003egetEnabledModules()\u003c/code\u003e. As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via \u003ccode\u003ePlugin.Import_\u0026lt;module\u0026gt;_restrict\u003c/code\u003e could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis could allow unauthorised access to restricted import-module functionality and, depending on the module and the user\u2019s event permissions, may allow unauthorised import or modification of event data through a module that should have been unavailable to the user\u2019s organisation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "MISP\u2019s importModule() path used getEnabledModule() to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by getEnabledModules(). As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via Plugin.Import_\u003cmodule\u003e_restrict could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name.\n\n\nThis could allow unauthorised access to restricted import-module functionality and, depending on the module and the user\u2019s event permissions, may allow unauthorised import or modification of event data through a module that should have been unavailable to the user\u2019s organisation."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/0ed79b4d3177f4b9e44040962161a1a436d2587d"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "importModule function in MISP ignores per-organisation import module restrictions",
"x_gcve": [
{
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20112"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-60125",
"datePublished": "2026-07-08T13:36:15.651888Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-08T13:36:48.024Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-08T13:36:48.095956Z",
"requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"serial": 1,
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20112"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.