FKIE_CVE-2026-98989
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-10-23 13:17 - Updated: 2026-10-23 13:17
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
namespace: check a recursive bind mount for mount namespace loops
do_loopback() refuses to bind mount the file of a mount namespace that
is as old as the caller's or older because a mount namespace that holds
a mount of its own file, or of an ancestor's, would cause a cycle. But
it only checks the dentry the bind mount starts from. With MS_REC
everything below it is copied and do_loopback() passes
CL_COPY_MNT_NS_FILE so mount namespace files below the source are
copied.
That's fine for a source in the caller's own mount namespace. Every
mount namespace file in there passed the same check when it was
bind-mounted. It isn't fine for a source in another mount namespace.
may_copy_tree() accepts a bind mount of any nsfs or pidfs file no matter
what mount namespace it lives in so that /proc/<pid>/ns/<ns> and pidfds
can be bind mounted. If we create a bind-mount stack of mount namespaces
file descriptors the kernel will copy them irrespective of their
ancestoral relationship to the mount namespace in question:
151 146 0:7 net:[4026531833] /tmp/nrc/y rw - nsfs nsfs rw
152 151 0:7 mnt:[4026532293] /tmp/nrc/y rw - nsfs nsfs rw
Mount 152 is a mount of the mount namespace file of mount namespace
4026532293 inside mount namespace 4026532293. That namespace and every
mount in it are leaked... All it takes is a process in an older mount
namespace that stacks the file and repeating it leaks without limit:
after control: Shmem: 380 kB
child: mount(/proc/self/fd/6, MS_BIND|MS_REC): ok
after cycle: Shmem: 65916 kB
do_move_mount() runs check_for_nsfs_mounts() over a detached tree for
exactly that reason. Do the same for the copy before it is grafted.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/namespace.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "a0ba48256f5dff6f75a45f8ce39fe57f21df1022",
"status": "affected",
"version": "e149ed2b805fefdccf7ccdfc19eca22fdd4514ac",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "37a82f400efa4d263542a5fa41755b21057f1e5d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "e149ed2b805fefdccf7ccdfc19eca22fdd4514ac",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c640a01a78e42302879006ed7b7d5a9a943ba815",
"status": "affected",
"version": "e149ed2b805fefdccf7ccdfc19eca22fdd4514ac",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/namespace.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.19"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.19",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.57",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.3",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnamespace: check a recursive bind mount for mount namespace loops\n\ndo_loopback() refuses to bind mount the file of a mount namespace that\nis as old as the caller\u0027s or older because a mount namespace that holds\na mount of its own file, or of an ancestor\u0027s, would cause a cycle. But\nit only checks the dentry the bind mount starts from. With MS_REC\neverything below it is copied and do_loopback() passes\nCL_COPY_MNT_NS_FILE so mount namespace files below the source are\ncopied.\n\nThat\u0027s fine for a source in the caller\u0027s own mount namespace. Every\nmount namespace file in there passed the same check when it was\nbind-mounted. It isn\u0027t fine for a source in another mount namespace.\nmay_copy_tree() accepts a bind mount of any nsfs or pidfs file no matter\nwhat mount namespace it lives in so that /proc/\u003cpid\u003e/ns/\u003cns\u003e and pidfds\ncan be bind mounted. If we create a bind-mount stack of mount namespaces\nfile descriptors the kernel will copy them irrespective of their\nancestoral relationship to the mount namespace in question:\n\n 151 146 0:7 net:[4026531833] /tmp/nrc/y rw - nsfs nsfs rw\n 152 151 0:7 mnt:[4026532293] /tmp/nrc/y rw - nsfs nsfs rw\n\nMount 152 is a mount of the mount namespace file of mount namespace\n4026532293 inside mount namespace 4026532293. That namespace and every\nmount in it are leaked... All it takes is a process in an older mount\nnamespace that stacks the file and repeating it leaks without limit:\n\n after control: Shmem: 380 kB\n child: mount(/proc/self/fd/6, MS_BIND|MS_REC): ok\n after cycle: Shmem: 65916 kB\n\ndo_move_mount() runs check_for_nsfs_mounts() over a detached tree for\nexactly that reason. Do the same for the copy before it is grafted."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-98989",
"lastModified": "2026-10-23T13:17:20.863",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-10-23T13:17:20.863",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37a82f400efa4d263542a5fa41755b21057f1e5d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0ba48256f5dff6f75a45f8ce39fe57f21df1022"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c640a01a78e42302879006ed7b7d5a9a943ba815"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.