FKIE_CVE-2026-93232
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-24 16:17 - Updated: 2026-10-19 10:17| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"mm/hugetlb.c",
"mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c",
"mm/sparse-vmemmap.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2ddf429e25cf8415d9c308f07e64012026bd4d77",
"status": "affected",
"version": "622026e87c4019e609010811757e31193cc23847",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c0caeceb0c3899dc42844d3979093b27d1434108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "622026e87c4019e609010811757e31193cc23847",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"mm/hugetlb.c",
"mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c",
"mm/sparse-vmemmap.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.1"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.1",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.3",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/hugetlb: fix boot panic with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM and HVO bootmem pages\n\nPatch series \"mm: Refactor bootmem gigantic hugepage allocation\", v4.\n\nThis series is split out from the earlier larger series \"mm: Generalize\nHVO for HugeTLB and device DAX\" [1]. It collects the first 19 patches of\nthat series as a standalone set of fixes and preparatory cleanups around\nbootmem HugeTLB handling, sparse initialization ordering, and related\nvmemmap setup.\n\nThe first patches fix a few bugs found while reviewing the existing code,\nincluding incorrect bootmem HVO handling, wrong vmemmap registration\narguments, a powerpc compound-vmemmap tracking bug, and too-late\ninitialization of gigantic bootmem HugeTLB struct pages.\n\nThe rest of the series reorders early memory initialization so the\nrelevant zone state is available before sparse and HugeTLB boot-time setup\nruns, then simplifies the remaining bootmem gigantic hugepage allocation\npath and removes code made obsolete by that rework.\n\nAt a high level:\n - patches [1-4] fix boot-time and arch-specific bugs\n - patches [5-12] reorder and simplify sparse/mm/hugetlb early init\n - patches [13-19] refactor bootmem gigantic hugepage allocation and\n remove obsolete helpers and state\n\n\nThis patch (of 19):\n\nCommit 622026e87c40 (\"mm/hugetlb: remove fake head pages\") switched\nHVO to reuse per-zone shared tail pages from zone-\u003evmemmap_tails[].\n\nThose shared tail pages were initialized in hugetlb_vmemmap_init(), but\nbootmem HugeTLB folios are prepared earlier from\ngather_bootmem_prealloc(). With hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on,\nprep_and_add_bootmem_folios() can access pageblock flags on bootmem\nHugeTLB pages whose mirrored tail struct pages already point to the shared\ntail page. On CONFIG_DEBUG_VM kernels, get_pfnblock_bitmap_bitidx() then\ndereferences the still-uninitialized shared tail page and can panic during\nboot.\n\nInitialize zone-\u003evmemmap_tails[] from gather_bootmem_prealloc(), before\nbootmem HugeTLB folios are processed, and drop the later initialization\nfrom hugetlb_vmemmap_init().\n\nThis bug only affects CONFIG_DEBUG_VM kernels, where the relevant\nassertion is evaluated."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-93232",
"lastModified": "2026-10-19T10:17:14.263",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-09-24T16:17:18.767",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ddf429e25cf8415d9c308f07e64012026bd4d77"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0caeceb0c3899dc42844d3979093b27d1434108"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.