FKIE_CVE-2026-90125
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-17 17:17 - Updated: 2026-10-30 13:20| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "38daae149c2102d96833cc6acd79c8f98fcce208",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd3dcc6a22a9186ed78da51ce09e889803552189",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "58066940076b90c16e821fd6f9767cd979cbdb5e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd3dcc6a22a9186ed78da51ce09e889803552189",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "12092ed28434bf41e08d41e3c5269eb6b337fc02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd3dcc6a22a9186ed78da51ce09e889803552189",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "442c5f1358ced0d4e716778ac06f1e323a7e4f21",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd3dcc6a22a9186ed78da51ce09e889803552189",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "73f6bdb0380486ab37fe12cd74de20abfaf5d3ae",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd3dcc6a22a9186ed78da51ce09e889803552189",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "deb6468f4164640e4dc875f008aa449cf55987a5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "bd3dcc6a22a9186ed78da51ce09e889803552189",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.16"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.16",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.191",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.157",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.110",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.52",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2.6",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.3",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: fix request buffer leak in smb2_new_read_req()\n\nsmb2_new_read_req() allocates the request buffer with\nsmb2_plain_req_init() but only publishes it to the caller with\n*buf = req at the very end of the function. Two error returns sit in\nbetween:\n\n\trc = smb2_plain_req_init(SMB2_READ, io_parms-\u003etcon, server,\n\t\t\t\t (void **) \u0026req, total_len);\n\tif (rc)\n\t\treturn rc;\n\n\tif (server == NULL)\n\t\treturn -ECONNABORTED;\n\t[...]\n\t\trdata-\u003emr = smbd_register_mr(server-\u003esmbd_conn,\n\t\t\t\t\t \u0026rdata-\u003esubreq.io_iter,\n\t\t\t\t\t true, need_invalidate);\n\t\tif (!rdata-\u003emr)\n\t\t\treturn -EAGAIN;\n\nOn either of them the buffer is neither released nor handed back, so\nit is leaked. The caller cannot clean up after it: smb2_async_readv()\ndoes \u0027goto out\u0027 on a non-zero return, which skips the\ncifs_small_buf_release(buf) at async_readv_out, and buf has not been\nassigned at that point in any case.\n\nThe write path has never had this problem. smb2_async_writev()\nregisters the memory region inline and jumps to its release label\ninstead of returning:\n\n\twdata-\u003emr = smbd_register_mr(...);\n\tif (!wdata-\u003emr) {\n\t\trc = -EAGAIN;\n\t\tgoto async_writev_out;\n\t}\n\nCommit b7972092199f (\"cifs: smbd: Retry on memory registration\nfailure\") changed both sides from -ENOBUFS to -EAGAIN in a single\npatch, which puts the two shapes next to each other.\n\nOnly the -EAGAIN return is reachable in practice, because\nsmb2_plain_req_init() calls smb2_reconnect() first and that already\nfails with -EIO when server is NULL, before anything is allocated.\nBoth returns are given the same treatment here rather than leaving\none of them correct only by accident.\n\nBecause -EAGAIN is a replayable error, the failure also reaches the\nretry block at the end of smb2_async_readv(), which marks the\nsubrequest NETFS_SREQ_NEED_RETRY, so a failing registration can be\nretried rather than ending the I/O, and every attempt that reaches it\nleaks another buffer. smb2_should_replay() short-circuits on\ntcon-\u003eretry, so on a hard mount the attempt count is not bounded by\nthe retrans setting.\n\nOnly the asynchronous read path is affected. The synchronous\nSMB2_read() caller passes rdata == NULL and the memory registration\nblock is guarded on rdata.\n\nThe memory registration failure path was pointed out by the Sashiko\nAI reviewer while it was reviewing an unrelated patch to\nsmb2_async_readv()."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-90125",
"lastModified": "2026-10-30T13:20:42.500",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-09-17T17:17:04.790",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12092ed28434bf41e08d41e3c5269eb6b337fc02"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/38daae149c2102d96833cc6acd79c8f98fcce208"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/442c5f1358ced0d4e716778ac06f1e323a7e4f21"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58066940076b90c16e821fd6f9767cd979cbdb5e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73f6bdb0380486ab37fe12cd74de20abfaf5d3ae"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/deb6468f4164640e4dc875f008aa449cf55987a5"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.