FKIE_CVE-2026-90096

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-17 17:17 - Updated: 2026-10-19 09:18
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fuse: invalidate the correct range after O_APPEND direct write fuse_direct_write_iter() captures pos before generic_write_checks(), which moves ki_pos to EOF for O_APPEND writes: fuse_direct_write_iter() { pos = iocb->ki_pos; /* 0 (user-supplied) */ generic_write_checks(); /* ki_pos -> EOF */ fuse_direct_io(); /* writes at EOF, correct */ invalidate(pos, pos + res); /* [0, res) -- wrong */ } The post-write invalidation targets a stale range instead of the actual written range at EOF. This can cause data inconsistency when the file size is not page-aligned. The tail page straddling EOF has a valid portion before EOF that concurrent readers can fault back in during the DIO write window: Tail page (file size X not page-aligned): page_start X (EOF) page_end |--- valid data ----|-- stale --| CPU0 (O_APPEND DIO writer) CPU1 (buffered reader) -------------------------- ---------------------- invalidate [X, X+len) tail page evicted FUSE_WRITE in flight ... read [page_start, X) tail page re-faulted [X, page_end) = stale FUSE_WRITE completes i_size = X + len invalidate [0, len) <- WRONG tail page still cached read [X, X+len) hits stale tail page returns old data Fix by reading pos back from iocb->ki_pos after generic_write_checks(), as generic_file_direct_write() does. Also fix a typo in the comment ("may have" -> "may have competed").
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "fs/fuse/file.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "833963069adf86dcbdffd4e7d7b3171f95070b77",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2b0408d0284f4ff376cf5610fa8c9905e93c2541",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "26d7e1f5c407b5859122b5cd47d7ebbf4b4c1cd2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2b0408d0284f4ff376cf5610fa8c9905e93c2541",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "fs/fuse/file.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.2"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "7.2",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.2.6",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.3",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfuse: invalidate the correct range after O_APPEND direct write\n\nfuse_direct_write_iter() captures pos before generic_write_checks(),\nwhich moves ki_pos to EOF for O_APPEND writes:\n\n  fuse_direct_write_iter()\n  {\n      pos = iocb-\u003eki_pos;           /* 0 (user-supplied)       */\n      generic_write_checks();       /* ki_pos -\u003e EOF           */\n      fuse_direct_io();             /* writes at EOF, correct  */\n      invalidate(pos, pos + res);   /* [0, res) -- wrong       */\n  }\n\nThe post-write invalidation targets a stale range instead of the\nactual written range at EOF.\n\nThis can cause data inconsistency when the file size is not\npage-aligned.  The tail page straddling EOF has a valid portion\nbefore EOF that concurrent readers can fault back in during the\nDIO write window:\n\n  Tail page (file size X not page-aligned):\n\n    page_start         X (EOF)   page_end\n    |--- valid data ----|-- stale --|\n\n  CPU0 (O_APPEND DIO writer)    CPU1 (buffered reader)\n  --------------------------    ----------------------\n  invalidate [X, X+len)\n    tail page evicted\n  FUSE_WRITE in flight ...\n                                read [page_start, X)\n                                  tail page re-faulted\n                                  [X, page_end) = stale\n  FUSE_WRITE completes\n  i_size = X + len\n  invalidate [0, len)  \u003c- WRONG\n    tail page still cached\n                                read [X, X+len)\n                                  hits stale tail page\n                                  returns old data\n\nFix by reading pos back from iocb-\u003eki_pos after generic_write_checks(),\nas generic_file_direct_write() does.\n\nAlso fix a typo in the comment (\"may have\" -\u003e \"may have competed\")."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-90096",
  "lastModified": "2026-10-19T09:18:58.887",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2026-09-17T17:17:01.233",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26d7e1f5c407b5859122b5cd47d7ebbf4b4c1cd2"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/833963069adf86dcbdffd4e7d7b3171f95070b77"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Received"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.