FKIE_CVE-2026-89812
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-16 11:16 - Updated: 2026-09-17 10:17
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: force complete the MES ring fences on reset
The MES scheduler ring has no drm scheduler (no_scheduler = true), so it is
skipped by the force-completion loop in amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(). It uses
a polling fence whose hw value lives in wb (GTT) memory and survives a MODE1
reset, while fence_drv.sync_seq keeps advancing for every packet.
When the reset is triggered because MES itself stopped responding, the
timed-out packets advance sync_seq past the last hw fence value MES wrote.
After resume the first MES submission polls forever on a seq that is never
written back, failing the resume and wedging the box on a second reset:
amdgpu: MES ring buffer is full.
amdgpu: *ERROR* ring gfx_0.0.0 test failed (-110)
amdgpu: resume of IP block <gfx_v11_0> failed -110
amdgpu: GPU reset end with ret = -110
Force complete the MES scheduler ring fences together with the scheduler rings
so their hw fence is realigned to sync_seq.
v2: cover all XCCs (one scheduler ring each), not just mes.ring[0].
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "ebe7542553d008e2285e0fbba0c63f0295a7e694",
"status": "affected",
"version": "34e087e8920e635c62e2ed6a758b0cd27f836d13",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "48dc279c3010ac8f91b1845b2abb3a1e9943a0f5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "34e087e8920e635c62e2ed6a758b0cd27f836d13",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.12"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.12",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2.5",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.3-rc1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: force complete the MES ring fences on reset\n\nThe MES scheduler ring has no drm scheduler (no_scheduler = true), so it is\nskipped by the force-completion loop in amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(). It uses\na polling fence whose hw value lives in wb (GTT) memory and survives a MODE1\nreset, while fence_drv.sync_seq keeps advancing for every packet.\n\nWhen the reset is triggered because MES itself stopped responding, the\ntimed-out packets advance sync_seq past the last hw fence value MES wrote.\nAfter resume the first MES submission polls forever on a seq that is never\nwritten back, failing the resume and wedging the box on a second reset:\n\n amdgpu: MES ring buffer is full.\n amdgpu: *ERROR* ring gfx_0.0.0 test failed (-110)\n amdgpu: resume of IP block \u003cgfx_v11_0\u003e failed -110\n amdgpu: GPU reset end with ret = -110\n\nForce complete the MES scheduler ring fences together with the scheduler rings\nso their hw fence is realigned to sync_seq.\n\nv2: cover all XCCs (one scheduler ring each), not just mes.ring[0]."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-89812",
"lastModified": "2026-09-17T10:17:04.390",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-09-16T11:16:46.380",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48dc279c3010ac8f91b1845b2abb3a1e9943a0f5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ebe7542553d008e2285e0fbba0c63f0295a7e694"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…