GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

FKIE_CVE-2026-85103

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-09 13:20 - Updated: 2026-09-10 04:18
Summary
A heap-based buffer overflow in VPN certificate ASN.1 decoding may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on Check Point Quantum Security Management and Quantum Security Gateway systems.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "Quantum Security Gateway",
          "vendor": "checkpoint",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 43 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 125 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 165 or below"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "product": "Quantum Security Management",
          "vendor": "checkpoint",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 43 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 125 or below"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 165 or below"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A heap-based buffer overflow in VPN certificate ASN.1 decoding may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on Check Point Quantum Security Management and Quantum Security Gateway systems."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-85103",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-10T04:18:18.390",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-85103",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-09-09T00:00:00+00:00",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-09-09T13:20:43.997",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
      "url": "https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk1000118"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@checkpoint.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-122"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@checkpoint.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…