FKIE_CVE-2026-8505
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-17 20:17 - Updated: 2026-10-24 20:10
Severity
Summary
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 has a vulnerability in Langflow's webhook authentication logic allows unauthenticated users to trigger the execution of any flow. The system incorrectly bypasses API key validation when the WEBHOOK_AUTH_ENABLE configuration is set to False (which is the default setting). This allows a remote attacker who knows a flow's UUID to execute it as if they were the owner, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| psirt@us.ibm.com | https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7278921 | Vendor Advisory |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Langflow OSS",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.10.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "psirt@us.ibm.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:langflow:langflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A32785B1-3CF7-4BD0-B6F8-1AA77D4E565B",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.10.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:apple:macos:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "387021A0-AF36-463C-A605-32EA7DAC172E",
"vulnerable": false
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "703AF700-7A70-47E2-BC3A-7FD03B3CA9C1",
"vulnerable": false
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A2572D17-1DE6-457B-99CC-64AFD54487EA",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 has a vulnerability in Langflow\u0027s webhook authentication logic allows unauthenticated users to trigger the execution of any flow. The system incorrectly bypasses API key validation when the WEBHOOK_AUTH_ENABLE configuration is set to False (which is the default setting). This allows a remote attacker who knows a flow\u0027s UUID to execute it as if they were the owner, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE)."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 hasta 1.10.0 tiene una vulnerabilidad en la l\u00f3gica de autenticaci\u00f3n de webhook de Langflow que permite a usuarios no autenticados activar la ejecuci\u00f3n de cualquier flujo. El sistema omite incorrectamente la validaci\u00f3n de clave API cuando la configuraci\u00f3n WEBHOOK_AUTH_ENABLE est\u00e1 establecida en False (que es la configuraci\u00f3n predeterminada). Esto permite a un atacante remoto que conoce el UUID de un flujo ejecutarlo como si fuera el propietario, lo que podr\u00eda conducir a la ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo (RCE)."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-8505",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T20:10:00.137",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-8505",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-17T20:17:31.417",
"references": [
{
"source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7278921"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-306"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-306"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.