FKIE_CVE-2026-8481

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-17 20:17 - Updated: 2026-07-17 20:17
Summary
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the code validation API endpoint. The POST /api/v1/validate/code endpoint accepts user-supplied Python code and executes it directly using Python's built-in exec() function without sandboxing, input validation, or privilege restrictions, enabling any authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands with the full privileges of the Langflow server process.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "product": "Langflow OSS",
          "vendor": "IBM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.10.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the code validation API endpoint.\u00a0The POST /api/v1/validate/code endpoint accepts user-supplied Python code and executes it directly using Python\u0027s built-in exec() function without sandboxing, input validation, or privilege restrictions, enabling any authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands with the full privileges of the Langflow server process."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-8481",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-17T20:17:30.747",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.9,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
        "impactScore": 6.0,
        "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-8481",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-07-17T19:40:33.659580Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-07-17T20:17:30.747",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7278923"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-94"
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@us.ibm.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…