FKIE_CVE-2026-8385

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-15 08:16 - Updated: 2026-07-23 11:10
Summary
The WP Go Maps WordPress plugin before 10.0.10 does not properly enforce the marker approval filter on the admin-ajax fallback for its datatables route, allowing unauthenticated visitors to retrieve marker records that the site owner has not approved for public display, including their title, category, address and description fields.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "WP Go Maps",
          "vendor": "Unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.0.10",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The WP Go Maps  WordPress plugin before 10.0.10 does not properly enforce the marker approval filter on the admin-ajax fallback for its datatables route, allowing unauthenticated visitors to retrieve marker records that the site owner has not approved for public display, including their title, category, address and description fields."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin de WordPress WP Go Maps anterior a la versi\u00f3n 10.0.10 no aplica correctamente el filtro de aprobaci\u00f3n de marcadores en el fallback de admin-ajax para su ruta de datatables, permitiendo a visitantes no autenticados recuperar registros de marcadores que el propietario del sitio no ha aprobado para su visualizaci\u00f3n p\u00fablica, incluyendo sus campos de t\u00edtulo, categor\u00eda, direcci\u00f3n y descripci\u00f3n."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-8385",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-23T11:10:00.120",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-8385",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-15T12:37:06.859604Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-06-15T08:16:21.013",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/984cad38-6d01-4956-8bf1-29585258780b/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-200"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…