FKIE_CVE-2026-82436

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-11-09 10:17 - Updated: 2026-11-09 11:17
Severity
Summary
Description `DefaultStateSerializer`, used to persist and restore stateful bolt checkpoints, configured Kryo with class registration disabled and an instantiation strategy that constructs objects without invoking their constructors, then deserialized whatever bytes the state store returned. A party able to write to the topology's keyspace in the state store, for example a co-tenant of a shared Redis instance or anyone with network access to it, could therefore place a serialized object graph that executes code inside the worker JVM when the state is restored. This requires the Redis-backed state provider, which is not the default. Write access to a state-store key is a data-plane privilege; code execution in the worker JVM is not, so the two are not equivalent. Mitigation Upgrade to 3.1.0, where the state serializer requires registered classes. Note that this is a behaviour change for existing state: checkpoints written by an affected version may fail to restore, and a migration step may be required. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict network and credential access to the state store to the cluster itself. Credit The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "org.apache.storm:storm-client",
          "packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.apache.storm/storm-client",
          "product": "Apache Storm Client",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.1.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Description\n\n`DefaultStateSerializer`, used to persist and restore stateful bolt checkpoints, configured Kryo with class\nregistration disabled and an instantiation strategy that constructs objects without invoking their\nconstructors, then deserialized whatever bytes the state store returned. A party able to write to the\ntopology\u0027s keyspace in the state store, for example a co-tenant of a shared Redis instance or anyone with\nnetwork access to it, could therefore place a serialized object graph that executes code inside the worker\nJVM when the state is restored.\n\nThis requires the Redis-backed state provider, which is not the default. Write access to a state-store key\nis a data-plane privilege; code execution in the worker JVM is not, so the two are not equivalent.\n\nMitigation\n\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where the state serializer requires registered classes.\n\nNote that this is a behaviour change for existing state: checkpoints written by an affected version may fail\nto restore, and a migration step may be required. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict\nnetwork and credential access to the state store to the cluster itself.\n\nCredit\n\nThe ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-82436",
  "lastModified": "2026-11-09T11:17:26.213",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2026-11-09T10:17:11.633",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/q5vqclkjdvngwkffcbwbwyym410sp8sc"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/11/09/1"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-502"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.