FKIE_CVE-2026-76648

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-23 19:19 - Updated: 2026-09-24 06:17
Severity
8.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Summary
CopyAPIView (awx/awx/api/generics.py:873) sets permission_classes = (IsAuthenticated,), so DRF's get_object() performs no object-level RBAC. The get() handler (lines 988–991) explicitly guards with request.user.can_access(obj._class_, 'read', obj) — but post() (lines 1001–1010) does not. POST only checks: can_access(model, 'add', create_kwargs_check) can_access(model, 'copy_related', obj) For JobTemplate, can_add (awx/awx/main/access.py:1465–1520) gates on inventory.use_role + project.use_role + execution_environment.read_role — resource-level roles that do not imply read on the source JT — and can_copy_related (1522–1534) checks only credentials.use_role. None of these imply the caller can read the source JT.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71177
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-76648
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2519720
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.7::el9"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7",
          "vendor": "Red Hat",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "1789580684",
              "versionType": "rpm"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "automation-controller",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "automation-controller-cli",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "CopyAPIView (awx/awx/api/generics.py:873) sets permission_classes =\n(IsAuthenticated,), so DRF\u0027s get_object() performs no object-level\nRBAC. The get() handler (lines 988\u2013991) explicitly guards with\nrequest.user.can_access(obj._class_, \u0027read\u0027, obj) \u2014 but post()\n(lines 1001\u20131010) does not. POST only checks:\n\ncan_access(model, \u0027add\u0027, create_kwargs_check)\n\ncan_access(model, \u0027copy_related\u0027, obj)\n\nFor JobTemplate, can_add (awx/awx/main/access.py:1465\u20131520) gates on\n\ninventory.use_role + project.use_role +\nexecution_environment.read_role \u2014 resource-level roles that do not\nimply read on the source JT \u2014 and can_copy_related (1522\u20131534) checks\nonly credentials.use_role. None of these imply the caller can read the\nsource JT."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-76648",
  "lastModified": "2026-09-24T06:17:01.203",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 8.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
        "impactScore": 4.7,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-09-23T19:19:15.030",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71177"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-76648"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2519720"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.