FKIE_CVE-2026-7537
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-06 04:17 - Updated: 2026-07-23 07:10
Severity
Summary
The MDJM Event Management plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.8.3 via the mdjm_send_comm_email function. This is due to no file type, extension, or MIME type validation being performed on uploaded files. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MDJM Event Management",
"vendor": "mdjm",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.7.8.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The MDJM Event Management plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.8.3 via the mdjm_send_comm_email function. This is due to no file type, extension, or MIME type validation being performed on uploaded files. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El plugin MDJM Event Management para WordPress es vulnerable a la carga arbitraria de archivos en todas las versiones hasta la 1.7.8.3, inclusive, a trav\u00e9s de la funci\u00f3n mdjm_send_comm_email. Esto se debe a que no se realiza ninguna validaci\u00f3n de tipo de archivo, extensi\u00f3n o tipo MIME en los archivos subidos. Esto hace posible que atacantes autenticados, con acceso de nivel de administrador y superior, suban archivos que pueden ser ejecutables, lo que hace posible la ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-7537",
"lastModified": "2026-07-23T07:10:00.113",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-7537",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-06T11:38:48.506554Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-06T04:17:32.107",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://github.com/d0n601/CVE-2026-7537"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mobile-dj-manager/tags/1.7.8.2/includes/admin/communications/comms-functions.php#L241"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mobile-dj-manager/tags/1.7.8.2/includes/admin/communications/comms-functions.php#L248"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mobile-dj-manager/tags/1.7.8.3/includes/admin/communications/comms-functions.php#L241"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mobile-dj-manager/tags/1.7.8.3/includes/admin/communications/comms-functions.php#L248"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mobile-dj-manager/trunk/includes/admin/communications/comms-functions.php#L241"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mobile-dj-manager/trunk/includes/admin/communications/comms-functions.php#L248"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3528037%40mobile-dj-manager\u0026new=3528037%40mobile-dj-manager\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://ryankozak.com/posts/cve-2026-7537/"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/42f37a41-deff-4b17-94d8-4e0fd1ce22c2?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-434"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.