FKIE_CVE-2026-7507
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-19 12:16 - Updated: 2026-05-20 17:16
Severity ?
Summary
A session fixation vulnerability was found in Keycloak's login-actions endpoints. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this flaw by pre-creating an authentication session and tricking a victim into visiting a maliciously crafted link. By leveraging the /login-actions/restart endpoint—which processes session handles without adequate CSRF protection or cookie ownership validation—an attacker can reset the authentication flow state. This causes Single Sign-On (SSO) to authenticate the victim transparently upon clicking the link, allowing the attacker to hijack the required-action form without needing the victim's credentials. A successful exploit could lead to complete account takeover, including highly privileged administrative accounts.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A session fixation vulnerability was found in Keycloak\u0027s login-actions endpoints. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this flaw by pre-creating an authentication session and tricking a victim into visiting a maliciously crafted link. By leveraging the /login-actions/restart endpoint\u2014which processes session handles without adequate CSRF protection or cookie ownership validation\u2014an attacker can reset the authentication flow state. This causes Single Sign-On (SSO) to authenticate the victim transparently upon clicking the link, allowing the attacker to hijack the required-action form without needing the victim\u0027s credentials. A successful exploit could lead to complete account takeover, including highly privileged administrative accounts."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-7507",
"lastModified": "2026-05-20T17:16:28.883",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-05-19T12:16:19.687",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19594"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19595"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19596"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19597"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7507"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2464145"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-290"
}
],
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…