FKIE_CVE-2026-75018
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-09-05 08:16 - Updated: 2026-09-08 13:12| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Custom Contact Forms",
"vendor": "outlawgt",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Custom Contact Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 7.16. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to permanently force-delete arbitrary posts of any post type (including pages, administrator-authored posts, and WooCommerce products) and write arbitrary ccf_field_* post meta onto any post regardless of ownership or post type. The top-level form ID is checked via edit_post/publish_posts, but the nested fields[].ID and choices[].ID paths processed by _create_and_map_fields() and _create_and_map_choices() carry no equivalent capability or post-type guard, leaving those sinks fully exposed while delete_item() and delete_submission() contain explicit post-type restriction fixes demonstrating the developer\u0027s awareness of scoping requirements."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-75018",
"lastModified": "2026-09-08T13:12:58.310",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-75018",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-07T11:05:13.227741Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-05T08:16:40.397",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.0/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L1026"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.0/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L291"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.0/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L336"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.0/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L360"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.0/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L977"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.0/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L993"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.2/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L1026"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.2/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L291"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.2/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L336"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.2/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L360"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.2/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L977"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/custom-contact-forms/tags/7.15.2/classes/class-ccf-api-form-controller.php#L993"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?reponame=\u0026old=3669565%40custom-contact-forms\u0026new=3669565%40custom-contact-forms"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/9a34ec54-7629-4c14-b5e0-d47f5d3a72ce?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-862"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.