FKIE_CVE-2026-74568
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-15 13:18 - Updated: 2026-10-16 20:17
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration
Fix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and
evicting that structure from the LPI xarray.
LPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI xarray (dist->lpi_xa).
When the reference count of an LPI structure drops to zero,
vgic_release_lpi_locked() removes the structure from the xarray and
frees it under the xarray lock.
However, the release of an LPI can race with a concurrent LPI
re-registration with the same INTID via vgic_add_lpi() on another CPU,
since the reference count drop and the xarray eviction are not performed
in a single atomic step. This can happen e.g. if the guest issues a
DISCARD while the LPI is still referenced from a vCPU's active-pending
list (ap_list), and the same INTID is re-mapped via MAPTI.
Particularly, vgic_release_lpi_locked() is called from two distinct
paths: direct release via vgic_put_irq(), and deferred release via
vgic_release_deleted_lpis(). During direct release, the issue can result
in deleting a newly registered LPI from the xarray:
CPU0 (Releasing LPI) CPU1 (Adding new LPI)
==================== =====================
vgic_put_irq()
__vgic_put_irq()
refcount_dec_and_test()
vgic_add_lpi()
xa_lock_irqsave()
old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)
vgic_try_get_irq_ref(old_irq) == false
new IRQ inserted --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..)
xa_unlock_irqrestore()
xa_lock_irqsave();
vgic_release_lpi_locked()
__xa_erase(.., irq->intid) <-- BUG: new IRQ is erased
kfree_rcu(old_irq)
During the deferred release path, the old IRQ can be leaked:
CPU0 (Releasing LPI) CPU1 (Adding new LPI)
==================== =====================
vgic_put_irq_norelease()
__vgic_put_irq()
refcount_dec_and_test()
irq->pending_release = true
vgic_add_lpi()
xa_lock_irqsave()
old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)
vgic_try_get_irq_ref(oldirq) == false
BUG: old IRQ overwritten --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..)
xa_unlock_irqrestore()
vgic_release_deleted_lpis()
xa_lock_irqsave()
xa_for_each() { .. } <-- old IRQ with pending_release = true
is gone, so it cannot be released
To fix the direct release path, move the reference count drop inside
the xarray lock, making sure that vgic_add_lpi() never encounters the
to-be-released LPI.
In the deferred release path, the refcount drop must happen under a raw
spinlock, so the xarray lock cannot be grabbed, and the same solution
does not work. Instead, update vgic_add_lpi(), so that if it evicts
an LPI from the xarray, it takes on the responsibility of freeing it.
Consequently, an LPI may now be freed concurrently after a deferred
release drops the refcount, so accessing the pending_release field is no
longer safe from use-after-free. Delete all uses of the flag, and update
vgic_release_deleted_lpis() to identify orphaned LPIs purely based on
their refcount.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c",
"arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c",
"include/kvm/arm_vgic.h"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "f8e5715a37378ea1a140ee1162fa441e149c5142",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3a08a6ca7c373198c84e2a8c025c395ee966ff8a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3a08a6ca7c373198c84e2a8c025c395ee966ff8a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3a08a6ca7c373198c84e2a8c025c395ee966ff8a",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c",
"arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c",
"include/kvm/arm_vgic.h"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.17"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.17",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.57",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration\n\nFix a potential race between decrementing an LPI\u0027s reference count and\nevicting that structure from the LPI xarray.\n\nLPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI xarray (dist-\u003elpi_xa).\nWhen the reference count of an LPI structure drops to zero,\nvgic_release_lpi_locked() removes the structure from the xarray and\nfrees it under the xarray lock.\n\nHowever, the release of an LPI can race with a concurrent LPI\nre-registration with the same INTID via vgic_add_lpi() on another CPU,\nsince the reference count drop and the xarray eviction are not performed\nin a single atomic step. This can happen e.g. if the guest issues a\nDISCARD while the LPI is still referenced from a vCPU\u0027s active-pending\nlist (ap_list), and the same INTID is re-mapped via MAPTI.\n\nParticularly, vgic_release_lpi_locked() is called from two distinct\npaths: direct release via vgic_put_irq(), and deferred release via\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis(). During direct release, the issue can result\nin deleting a newly registered LPI from the xarray:\n\n CPU0 (Releasing LPI) CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n ==================== =====================\n vgic_put_irq()\n __vgic_put_irq()\n refcount_dec_and_test()\n vgic_add_lpi()\n xa_lock_irqsave()\n old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n vgic_try_get_irq_ref(old_irq) == false\n new IRQ inserted --\u003e __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n xa_lock_irqsave();\n vgic_release_lpi_locked()\n __xa_erase(.., irq-\u003eintid) \u003c-- BUG: new IRQ is erased\n kfree_rcu(old_irq)\n\nDuring the deferred release path, the old IRQ can be leaked:\n\n CPU0 (Releasing LPI) CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n ==================== =====================\n vgic_put_irq_norelease()\n __vgic_put_irq()\n refcount_dec_and_test()\n irq-\u003epending_release = true\n vgic_add_lpi()\n xa_lock_irqsave()\n old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n vgic_try_get_irq_ref(oldirq) == false\n BUG: old IRQ overwritten --\u003e __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n\n vgic_release_deleted_lpis()\n xa_lock_irqsave()\n xa_for_each() { .. } \u003c-- old IRQ with pending_release = true\n is gone, so it cannot be released\n\nTo fix the direct release path, move the reference count drop inside\nthe xarray lock, making sure that vgic_add_lpi() never encounters the\nto-be-released LPI.\n\nIn the deferred release path, the refcount drop must happen under a raw\nspinlock, so the xarray lock cannot be grabbed, and the same solution\ndoes not work. Instead, update vgic_add_lpi(), so that if it evicts\nan LPI from the xarray, it takes on the responsibility of freeing it.\nConsequently, an LPI may now be freed concurrently after a deferred\nrelease drops the refcount, so accessing the pending_release field is no\nlonger safe from use-after-free. Delete all uses of the flag, and update\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis() to identify orphaned LPIs purely based on\ntheir refcount."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-74568",
"lastModified": "2026-10-16T20:17:38.310",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-74568",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-16T19:00:27.387340Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-15T13:18:02.370",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8e5715a37378ea1a140ee1162fa441e149c5142"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.