FKIE_CVE-2026-74430
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-15 06:22 - Updated: 2026-08-17 06:19
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rxrpc: Fix ACKALL packet handling
rxrpc_input_ackall() accepts ACKALL packets without checking whether the
call is in a state that can legitimately have outstanding transmit buffers.
A forged ACKALL can therefore reach a new service call in
RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_RECV_REQUEST before any reply packets have been queued.
In that state call->tx_top is zero and call->tx_queue is NULL, so
rxrpc_rotate_tx_window() dereferences a NULL txqueue and triggers a
null-pointer dereference.
Fix the handling of ACKALL packets by the following means:
(1) Add two new call states: RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_PRE_SEND which indicates
that the client call is connected, but nothing has been transmitted as
yet; and RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_ACK, which indicates that everything
has been transmitted at least once, but we're now waiting for the
stuff remaining in the Tx buffer to be ACK'd (retransmissions may
still happen).
The RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_PRE_SEND state is set when the call is assigned
a channel and transitions to RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_SEND_REQUEST when the
first packet is transmitted.
RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_REPLY is then narrowed in scope to indicate
that all Tx packets have been ACK'd and we're now waiting for the
reply to be received.
(2) As per Wyatt Feng's original patch[1], the ACKALL handler then checks
that the call state is one in which there might be stuff in the Tx
buffer to ACK, but now this includes AWAIT_ACK rather than
AWAIT_REPLY. ACKALL packets are ignored if received in the wrong
state.
Note that unlike Wyatt Feng's patch, it's no longer necessary to check
to see if the Tx buffer exists as this the state set now covers this.
(3) Make the ACKALL handler use call->tx_transmitted rather than
call->tx_top as the former is explicitly the highest packet seq number
transmitted, whereas the latter has a looser definition.
Thanks to Jeffrey Altman for a description of the history of the ACKALL
packet[1].
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h",
"net/rxrpc/call_event.c",
"net/rxrpc/call_object.c",
"net/rxrpc/conn_client.c",
"net/rxrpc/input.c",
"net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8db6a2c95e36938076b37466ce36774526a5c8c3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b341a0263b1b804d329f864c2dc24815364510ec",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "523cb585672ae681b2d3b0d620aec5313774e2e2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b341a0263b1b804d329f864c2dc24815364510ec",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9b6ce594808580b2a19e6e1aa459ef56c0153ac1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b341a0263b1b804d329f864c2dc24815364510ec",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h",
"net/rxrpc/call_event.c",
"net/rxrpc/call_object.c",
"net/rxrpc/conn_client.c",
"net/rxrpc/input.c",
"net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.14"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.14",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.40",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1.5",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc: Fix ACKALL packet handling\n\nrxrpc_input_ackall() accepts ACKALL packets without checking whether the\ncall is in a state that can legitimately have outstanding transmit buffers.\nA forged ACKALL can therefore reach a new service call in\nRXRPC_CALL_SERVER_RECV_REQUEST before any reply packets have been queued.\n\nIn that state call-\u003etx_top is zero and call-\u003etx_queue is NULL, so\nrxrpc_rotate_tx_window() dereferences a NULL txqueue and triggers a\nnull-pointer dereference.\n\nFix the handling of ACKALL packets by the following means:\n\n (1) Add two new call states: RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_PRE_SEND which indicates\n that the client call is connected, but nothing has been transmitted as\n yet; and RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_ACK, which indicates that everything\n has been transmitted at least once, but we\u0027re now waiting for the\n stuff remaining in the Tx buffer to be ACK\u0027d (retransmissions may\n still happen).\n\n The RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_PRE_SEND state is set when the call is assigned\n a channel and transitions to RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_SEND_REQUEST when the\n first packet is transmitted.\n\n RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_REPLY is then narrowed in scope to indicate\n that all Tx packets have been ACK\u0027d and we\u0027re now waiting for the\n reply to be received.\n\n (2) As per Wyatt Feng\u0027s original patch[1], the ACKALL handler then checks\n that the call state is one in which there might be stuff in the Tx\n buffer to ACK, but now this includes AWAIT_ACK rather than\n AWAIT_REPLY. ACKALL packets are ignored if received in the wrong\n state.\n\n Note that unlike Wyatt Feng\u0027s patch, it\u0027s no longer necessary to check\n to see if the Tx buffer exists as this the state set now covers this.\n\n (3) Make the ACKALL handler use call-\u003etx_transmitted rather than\n call-\u003etx_top as the former is explicitly the highest packet seq number\n transmitted, whereas the latter has a looser definition.\n\nThanks to Jeffrey Altman for a description of the history of the ACKALL\npacket[1]."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-74430",
"lastModified": "2026-08-17T06:19:38.597",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-15T06:22:45.120",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/523cb585672ae681b2d3b0d620aec5313774e2e2"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8db6a2c95e36938076b37466ce36774526a5c8c3"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9b6ce594808580b2a19e6e1aa459ef56c0153ac1"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…