FKIE_CVE-2026-72472
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-15 06:22 - Updated: 2026-10-16 19:17
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list
Lingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear
to have issues.
Generally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock
list to avoid use-after-free (UAF) problems with file locks. However,
functions like nfs_delegation_claim_locks and nfs4_reclaim_locks cannot
adhere to this rule because recover_lock or nfs4_lock_delegation_recall
may take a long time. To resolve this, NFS switches to using nfsi->rwsem
for the same protection, and nfs_reclaim_locks follows this approach.
Although nfs_delegation_claim_locks uses so_delegreturn_mutex instead,
this is inadequate since a single inode can have multiple nfs4_state
instances. Therefore, the fix is to also use nfsi->rwsem in this case.
Furthermore, after commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range
lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), the functions
nfs4_locku_done and nfs4_lock_done also break this rule because they
call locks_lock_inode_wait without holding nfsi->rwsem. Simply adding
this protection could cause many deadlocks, so instead, the call to
locks_lock_inode_wait is moved into _nfs4_proc_setlk. Regarding the bug
fixed by commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range
lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), it has been resolved
after commit 0460253913e5 ("NFSv4: nfs4_do_open() is incorrectly triggering
state recovery") because all slots are drained before calling
nfs4_do_reclaim, which prevents concurrent stateid changes along this path.
Also, nfs_delegation_claim_locks does not cause this concurrency either
since when _nfs4_proc_setlk is called with NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, no RPC is
sent, so nfs4_lock_done is not called. Therefore,
nfs4_lock_delegation_recall from nfs_delegation_claim_locks is the first
time the stateid is set.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/delegation.c",
"fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c",
"include/linux/nfs_xdr.h"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1cda95bf2e9c0e6b63545b7565fe4a1e474322f4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c69899a17ca4836230720e65493942d9582a0424",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f161ef7b0dd2f51fdb002ba4a4e9bf0ee7409218",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c69899a17ca4836230720e65493942d9582a0424",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e68035178e65e2b3aa386ce61202ff33724ae418",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c69899a17ca4836230720e65493942d9582a0424",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4837fb36219e6c08b666bc31a86841bad8526358",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c69899a17ca4836230720e65493942d9582a0424",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/delegation.c",
"fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c",
"include/linux/nfs_xdr.h"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.97",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.40",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1.5",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfs: use nfsi-\u003erwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list\n\nLingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear\nto have issues.\n\nGenerally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock\nlist to avoid use-after-free (UAF) problems with file locks. However,\nfunctions like nfs_delegation_claim_locks and nfs4_reclaim_locks cannot\nadhere to this rule because recover_lock or nfs4_lock_delegation_recall\nmay take a long time. To resolve this, NFS switches to using nfsi-\u003erwsem\nfor the same protection, and nfs_reclaim_locks follows this approach.\nAlthough nfs_delegation_claim_locks uses so_delegreturn_mutex instead,\nthis is inadequate since a single inode can have multiple nfs4_state\ninstances. Therefore, the fix is to also use nfsi-\u003erwsem in this case.\n\nFurthermore, after commit c69899a17ca4 (\"NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range\nlock must be atomic with the stateid update\"), the functions\nnfs4_locku_done and nfs4_lock_done also break this rule because they\ncall locks_lock_inode_wait without holding nfsi-\u003erwsem. Simply adding\nthis protection could cause many deadlocks, so instead, the call to\nlocks_lock_inode_wait is moved into _nfs4_proc_setlk. Regarding the bug\nfixed by commit c69899a17ca4 (\"NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range\nlock must be atomic with the stateid update\"), it has been resolved\nafter commit 0460253913e5 (\"NFSv4: nfs4_do_open() is incorrectly triggering\nstate recovery\") because all slots are drained before calling\nnfs4_do_reclaim, which prevents concurrent stateid changes along this path.\nAlso, nfs_delegation_claim_locks does not cause this concurrency either\nsince when _nfs4_proc_setlk is called with NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, no RPC is\nsent, so nfs4_lock_done is not called. Therefore,\nnfs4_lock_delegation_recall from nfs_delegation_claim_locks is the first\ntime the stateid is set."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-72472",
"lastModified": "2026-10-16T19:17:32.030",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-72472",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-16T18:50:31.105592Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-15T06:22:21.313",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cda95bf2e9c0e6b63545b7565fe4a1e474322f4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4837fb36219e6c08b666bc31a86841bad8526358"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e68035178e65e2b3aa386ce61202ff33724ae418"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f161ef7b0dd2f51fdb002ba4a4e9bf0ee7409218"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.