FKIE_CVE-2026-64181

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-19 16:18 - Updated: 2026-07-20 15:17
Severity
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: fix __vm_normal_page() to handle missing support for pmd_special()/pud_special() On x86 32-bit with THP enabled, zap_huge_pmd() is seen to generate a "WARNING: mm/memory.c:735 at __vm_normal_page+0x6a/0x7d", from the VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(is_zero_pfn(pfn) || is_huge_zero_pfn(pfn)); followed by "BUG: Bad rss-counter state"s, then later "BUG: Bad page state"s when reclaim gets to call shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan(). It's as if the _PAGE_SPECIAL bit never got set in the huge_zero pmd: and indeed, whereas pte_special() and pte_mkspecial() are subject to a dedicated CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL, pmd_special() and pmd_mkspecial() are subject to CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PMD_PFNMAP, which is never enabled on any 32-bit architecture. While the problem was exposed through commit d80a9cb1a64a ("mm/huge_memory: add and use normal_or_softleaf_folio_pmd()"), it was an oversight in commit af38538801c6 ("mm/memory: factor out common code from vm_normal_page_*()") and would result in other problems: * huge zero folio accounted in smaps, pagemap (PAGE_IS_FILE) and numamaps as file-backed THP * folio_walk_start() returning the folio even without FW_ZEROPAGE set. Callers seem to tolerate that, though. ... and triggering the VM_WARN_ON_ONE(), although never reported so far. To fix it, teach vm_normal_page_pmd()/vm_normal_page_pud() to consider whether pmd_special/pud_special is actually implemented.
References
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62153767e8fc3889bc6508e9ffe927aaf64c4334
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9052ea2ee2233be5d4786b8909151ca2bfbedf99
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0c6ccd9828c3a1950623b546fa57292a77b5c73
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "mm/memory.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "62153767e8fc3889bc6508e9ffe927aaf64c4334",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "af38538801c6a97565b44700ee6695d7d60ad779",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "9052ea2ee2233be5d4786b8909151ca2bfbedf99",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "af38538801c6a97565b44700ee6695d7d60ad779",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "c0c6ccd9828c3a1950623b546fa57292a77b5c73",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "af38538801c6a97565b44700ee6695d7d60ad779",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "mm/memory.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.18"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6.18",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.18.34",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.0.11",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.1",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: fix __vm_normal_page() to handle missing support for pmd_special()/pud_special()\n\nOn x86 32-bit with THP enabled, zap_huge_pmd() is seen to generate a\n\"WARNING: mm/memory.c:735 at __vm_normal_page+0x6a/0x7d\", from the\nVM_WARN_ON_ONCE(is_zero_pfn(pfn) || is_huge_zero_pfn(pfn)); followed by\n\"BUG: Bad rss-counter state\"s, then later \"BUG: Bad page state\"s when\nreclaim gets to call shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan().\n\nIt\u0027s as if the _PAGE_SPECIAL bit never got set in the huge_zero pmd: and\nindeed, whereas pte_special() and pte_mkspecial() are subject to a\ndedicated CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL, pmd_special() and pmd_mkspecial()\nare subject to CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PMD_PFNMAP, which is never enabled on\nany 32-bit architecture.\n\nWhile the problem was exposed through commit d80a9cb1a64a\n(\"mm/huge_memory: add and use normal_or_softleaf_folio_pmd()\"), it was an\noversight in commit af38538801c6 (\"mm/memory: factor out common code from\nvm_normal_page_*()\") and would result in other problems:\n* huge zero folio accounted in smaps, pagemap (PAGE_IS_FILE) and\n  numamaps as file-backed THP\n* folio_walk_start() returning the folio even without FW_ZEROPAGE set.\n  Callers seem to tolerate that, though.\n\n... and triggering the VM_WARN_ON_ONE(), although never reported so far.\n\nTo fix it, teach vm_normal_page_pmd()/vm_normal_page_pud() to consider\nwhether pmd_special/pud_special is actually implemented."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-64181",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-20T15:17:13.690",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-07-19T16:18:00.493",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62153767e8fc3889bc6508e9ffe927aaf64c4334"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9052ea2ee2233be5d4786b8909151ca2bfbedf99"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0c6ccd9828c3a1950623b546fa57292a77b5c73"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Received"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.