FKIE_CVE-2026-64159
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-19 16:17 - Updated: 2026-07-19 16:17
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfs: Fix zeropoint update where i_size > remote_i_size
Fix the update of the zero point[*] by netfs_release_folio() when there is
uncommitted data in the pagecache beyond the folio being released but the
on-server EOF is in this folio (ie. i_size > remote_i_size). The update
needs to limit zero_point to remote_i_size, not i_size as i_size is a local
phenomenon reflecting updates made locally to the pagecache, not stuff
written to the server. remote_i_size tracks the server's i_size.
[*] The zero point is the file position from which we can assume that the
server will just return zeros, so we can avoid generating reads.
Note that netfs_invalidate_folio() probably doesn't need fixing as
zero_point should be updated by setattr after truncation or fallocate.
Found with:
fsx -q -N 1000000 -p 10000 -o 128000 -l 600000 \
/xfstest.test/junk --replay-ops=junk.fsxops
using the following as junk.fsxops:
truncate 0x0 0x1bbae 0x82864
write 0x3ef2e 0xf9c8 0x1bbae
write 0x67e05 0xcb5a 0x4e8f6
mapread 0x57781 0x85b6 0x7495f
copy_range 0x5d3d 0x10329 0x54fac 0x7495f
write 0x64710 0x1c2b 0x7495f
mapread 0x64000 0x1000 0x7495f
on cifs with the default cache option.
It shows read-gaps on folio 0x64 failing with a short read (ie. it hits
EOF) if the FMODE_READ check is commented out in netfs_perform_write():
if (//(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) ||
netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx)) {
and no fscache. This was initially found with the generic/522 xfstest.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/netfs/misc.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5cd5207de519ef0c085f4f559adf5eefcb4c5202",
"status": "affected",
"version": "cce6bfa6ca0e30af9927b0074c97fe6a92f28092",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4543a4d737944134a1394afe797622546fbcc98a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "cce6bfa6ca0e30af9927b0074c97fe6a92f28092",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "e2814004138a541110d4b2dc254a8f619c2c4ce0",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.10.8",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/netfs/misc.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.11"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.11",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfs: Fix zeropoint update where i_size \u003e remote_i_size\n\nFix the update of the zero point[*] by netfs_release_folio() when there is\nuncommitted data in the pagecache beyond the folio being released but the\non-server EOF is in this folio (ie. i_size \u003e remote_i_size). The update\nneeds to limit zero_point to remote_i_size, not i_size as i_size is a local\nphenomenon reflecting updates made locally to the pagecache, not stuff\nwritten to the server. remote_i_size tracks the server\u0027s i_size.\n\n[*] The zero point is the file position from which we can assume that the\n server will just return zeros, so we can avoid generating reads.\n\nNote that netfs_invalidate_folio() probably doesn\u0027t need fixing as\nzero_point should be updated by setattr after truncation or fallocate.\n\nFound with:\n\n fsx -q -N 1000000 -p 10000 -o 128000 -l 600000 \\\n /xfstest.test/junk --replay-ops=junk.fsxops\n\nusing the following as junk.fsxops:\n\n truncate 0x0 0x1bbae 0x82864\n write 0x3ef2e 0xf9c8 0x1bbae\n write 0x67e05 0xcb5a 0x4e8f6\n mapread 0x57781 0x85b6 0x7495f\n copy_range 0x5d3d 0x10329 0x54fac 0x7495f\n write 0x64710 0x1c2b 0x7495f\n mapread 0x64000 0x1000 0x7495f\n\non cifs with the default cache option.\n\nIt shows read-gaps on folio 0x64 failing with a short read (ie. it hits\nEOF) if the FMODE_READ check is commented out in netfs_perform_write():\n\n if (//(file-\u003ef_mode \u0026 FMODE_READ) ||\n netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx)) {\n\nand no fscache. This was initially found with the generic/522 xfstest."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-64159",
"lastModified": "2026-07-19T16:17:57.913",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-07-19T16:17:57.913",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4543a4d737944134a1394afe797622546fbcc98a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5cd5207de519ef0c085f4f559adf5eefcb4c5202"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…