FKIE_CVE-2026-63811
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-07-19 12:16 - Updated: 2026-07-19 12:16
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: read COW data with the original inode during atomic write
When updating an atomic-write file, f2fs_write_begin() may read the
previously written data back from the COW inode:
prepare_atomic_write_begin() locates the block in the COW inode and sets
use_cow, and the read bio is then built with the COW inode:
f2fs_submit_page_read(use_cow ? F2FS_I(inode)->cow_inode : inode,
...);
and f2fs_grab_read_bio() decides whether to schedule fs-layer decryption
(STEP_DECRYPT) for the bio based on that inode via
fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto().
However, the folio being filled belongs to the original inode
(folio->mapping->host == inode), and the data stored in the COW block was
encrypted (or left as plaintext) using the original inode's context, not
the COW inode's -- see f2fs_encrypt_one_page(), which keys off
fio->page->mapping->host. fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks() likewise
operates on folio->mapping->host.
The COW inode is created as a tmpfile in the parent directory and inherits
its encryption policy from there. With test_dummy_encryption the newly
created COW inode gets the dummy policy and becomes encrypted, while a
pre-existing regular file -- created before the policy applied, e.g.
already present in the on-disk image -- stays unencrypted. The read
path then sets STEP_DECRYPT based on the encrypted COW inode and calls
fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks() on a folio whose host (the unencrypted
original inode) has a NULL ->i_crypt_info, dereferencing it:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address ...
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f]
RIP: 0010:fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks+0xa0/0x310
Workqueue: f2fs_post_read_wq f2fs_post_read_work
Call Trace:
fscrypt_decrypt_bio+0x1eb/0x340
f2fs_post_read_work+0xba/0x140
process_one_work+0x91c/0x1a40
worker_thread+0x677/0xe90
kthread+0x2bc/0x3a0
The COW inode is only needed to locate the on-disk block, and that block
address is already resolved into @blkaddr by prepare_atomic_write_begin()
via __find_data_block(cow_inode, ...); f2fs_submit_page_read() then reads
from that physical @blkaddr directly, so the inode argument only selects
the post-read crypto context, not which block is fetched. Reading with
@inode therefore returns the same (latest, not-yet-committed) COW data,
while making both the fs-layer decryption decision and the inline crypto
path use the correct (original inode's) key.
With the COW inode no longer used at the read site, the use_cow flag has no
remaining consumer; drop it from f2fs_write_begin() and
prepare_atomic_write_begin().
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/f2fs/data.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "a92332f32a8d31a7eee47b1dc1d751cb3319908f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "591fc34e1f98b0d7eef4aa3440bfdff3c5a1cadd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a41075acde0124d2f8a5f563068a5d63e8ffd57b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "591fc34e1f98b0d7eef4aa3440bfdff3c5a1cadd",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/f2fs/data.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2-rc1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: read COW data with the original inode during atomic write\n\nWhen updating an atomic-write file, f2fs_write_begin() may read the\npreviously written data back from the COW inode:\nprepare_atomic_write_begin() locates the block in the COW inode and sets\nuse_cow, and the read bio is then built with the COW inode:\n\n\tf2fs_submit_page_read(use_cow ? F2FS_I(inode)-\u003ecow_inode : inode,\n\t\t\t ...);\n\nand f2fs_grab_read_bio() decides whether to schedule fs-layer decryption\n(STEP_DECRYPT) for the bio based on that inode via\nfscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto().\n\nHowever, the folio being filled belongs to the original inode\n(folio-\u003emapping-\u003ehost == inode), and the data stored in the COW block was\nencrypted (or left as plaintext) using the original inode\u0027s context, not\nthe COW inode\u0027s -- see f2fs_encrypt_one_page(), which keys off\nfio-\u003epage-\u003emapping-\u003ehost. fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks() likewise\noperates on folio-\u003emapping-\u003ehost.\n\nThe COW inode is created as a tmpfile in the parent directory and inherits\nits encryption policy from there. With test_dummy_encryption the newly\ncreated COW inode gets the dummy policy and becomes encrypted, while a\npre-existing regular file -- created before the policy applied, e.g.\nalready present in the on-disk image -- stays unencrypted. The read\npath then sets STEP_DECRYPT based on the encrypted COW inode and calls\nfscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks() on a folio whose host (the unencrypted\noriginal inode) has a NULL -\u003ei_crypt_info, dereferencing it:\n\n Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address ...\n KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f]\n RIP: 0010:fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks+0xa0/0x310\n Workqueue: f2fs_post_read_wq f2fs_post_read_work\n Call Trace:\n fscrypt_decrypt_bio+0x1eb/0x340\n f2fs_post_read_work+0xba/0x140\n process_one_work+0x91c/0x1a40\n worker_thread+0x677/0xe90\n kthread+0x2bc/0x3a0\n\nThe COW inode is only needed to locate the on-disk block, and that block\naddress is already resolved into @blkaddr by prepare_atomic_write_begin()\nvia __find_data_block(cow_inode, ...); f2fs_submit_page_read() then reads\nfrom that physical @blkaddr directly, so the inode argument only selects\nthe post-read crypto context, not which block is fetched. Reading with\n@inode therefore returns the same (latest, not-yet-committed) COW data,\nwhile making both the fs-layer decryption decision and the inline crypto\npath use the correct (original inode\u0027s) key.\n\nWith the COW inode no longer used at the read site, the use_cow flag has no\nremaining consumer; drop it from f2fs_write_begin() and\nprepare_atomic_write_begin()."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-63811",
"lastModified": "2026-07-19T12:16:54.023",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-07-19T12:16:54.023",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a41075acde0124d2f8a5f563068a5d63e8ffd57b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a92332f32a8d31a7eee47b1dc1d751cb3319908f"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Received"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…