FKIE_CVE-2026-60093
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-24 17:17 - Updated: 2026-10-12 15:10
Severity
Summary
Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure-Storage Datalake component
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.
The camel-azure-storage-datalake component can download an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 file to the local filesystem through its downloadToFile operation, writing into the directory named by the fileDir endpoint option. DataLakeFileOperations.downloadToFile built the local target by joining fileDir with the remote path name exactly as the Azure SDK reported it (new File(fileDir, fileClientWrapper.getFileName())) and passed the result straight to the SDK download call, with no lexical normalization and no check that the resolved location stayed inside fileDir. The remote name is not route-controlled data: the consumer enumerates the filesystem in DataLakeConsumer.createBatchExchangesFromPath, which lists paths and creates one exchange per entry from PathItem.getName() verbatim, applying no name filtering by default. A path name containing parent-directory segments therefore resolved to a location outside the configured fileDir, letting anyone able to influence the names present in the consumed Data Lake filesystem cause Camel to create or overwrite a file at a location of their choosing, with the privileges of the Camel process. Depending on what the process can write to, overwriting a file outside the download directory can escalate beyond the loss of integrity of that file. The fileDir option is an ordinary common-group configuration parameter and carries no security marker, so nothing signalled to users that its value was not being enforced as a containment boundary. Camel's other file-download consumers - camel-file, camel-ftp, camel-smb, camel-mina-sftp and camel-azure-files - already constrained their local downloads to the configured directory using a path-segment boundary check; the camel-azure-storage-datalake download path was not covered by that work.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, constrain the names the consumer will act on using the regex endpoint option, which is applied to each listed path name as a full-string match, so that only simple single-segment names are accepted and any name carrying a path separator or a parent-directory segment is filtered out before an exchange is created. Alternatively, avoid the downloadToFile operation on untrusted filesystems and write the payload from the route under a file name the route itself controls, rather than one taken from the remote listing. As defence in depth, treat the object names in any externally writable Data Lake filesystem as untrusted input and do not derive local filesystem paths from them.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@apache.org | https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-60093.html | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/24/8 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.camel:camel-azure-storage-datalake",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.apache.camel/camel-azure-storage-datalake",
"product": "Apache Camel",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.14.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.18.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.15.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.22.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.19.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DEBE8FE2-2989-4FC0-B805-C740A8FDF42A",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7BC98A81-8301-4163-A47E-C6A9332A2454",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.18.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.15.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "10DE8B35-C125-4461-A7F7-3BDA3E3CB316",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.22.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.19.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure-Storage Datalake component\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.\n\n\n\nThe camel-azure-storage-datalake component can download an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 file to the local filesystem through its downloadToFile operation, writing into the directory named by the fileDir endpoint option. DataLakeFileOperations.downloadToFile built the local target by joining fileDir with the remote path name exactly as the Azure SDK reported it (new File(fileDir, fileClientWrapper.getFileName())) and passed the result straight to the SDK download call, with no lexical normalization and no check that the resolved location stayed inside fileDir. The remote name is not route-controlled data: the consumer enumerates the filesystem in DataLakeConsumer.createBatchExchangesFromPath, which lists paths and creates one exchange per entry from PathItem.getName() verbatim, applying no name filtering by default. A path name containing parent-directory segments therefore resolved to a location outside the configured fileDir, letting anyone able to influence the names present in the consumed Data Lake filesystem cause Camel to create or overwrite a file at a location of their choosing, with the privileges of the Camel process. Depending on what the process can write to, overwriting a file outside the download directory can escalate beyond the loss of integrity of that file. The fileDir option is an ordinary common-group configuration parameter and carries no security marker, so nothing signalled to users that its value was not being enforced as a containment boundary. Camel\u0027s other file-download consumers - camel-file, camel-ftp, camel-smb, camel-mina-sftp and camel-azure-files - already constrained their local downloads to the configured directory using a path-segment boundary check; the camel-azure-storage-datalake download path was not covered by that work.\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, constrain the names the consumer will act on using the regex endpoint option, which is applied to each listed path name as a full-string match, so that only simple single-segment names are accepted and any name carrying a path separator or a parent-directory segment is filtered out before an exchange is created. Alternatively, avoid the downloadToFile operation on untrusted filesystems and write the payload from the route under a file name the route itself controls, rather than one taken from the remote listing. As defence in depth, treat the object names in any externally writable Data Lake filesystem as untrusted input and do not derive local filesystem paths from them."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de salto de ruta relativo en el componente Apache Camel Azure-Storage Datalake\n\nEste problema afecta a Apache Camel: desde 4.0.0 antes de 4.14.9, desde 4.15.0 antes de 4.18.4, desde 4.19.0 antes de 4.22.0.\n\nEl componente camel-azure-storage-datalake puede descargar un archivo de Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 al sistema de archivos local a trav\u00e9s de su operaci\u00f3n downloadToFile, escribiendo en el directorio nombrado por la opci\u00f3n de endpoint fileDir. DataLakeFileOperations.downloadToFile construy\u00f3 el destino local uniendo fileDir con el nombre de ruta remoto exactamente como lo inform\u00f3 el SDK de Azure (new File(fileDir, fileClientWrapper.getFileName())) y pas\u00f3 el resultado directamente a la llamada de descarga del SDK, sin normalizaci\u00f3n l\u00e9xica y sin verificar que la ubicaci\u00f3n resuelta permaneciera dentro de fileDir. El nombre remoto no es un dato controlado por la ruta: el consumidor enumera el sistema de archivos en DataLakeConsumer.createBatchExchangesFromPath, que lista rutas y crea un intercambio por entrada de PathItem.getName() textualmente, sin aplicar ning\u00fan filtro de nombre por defecto. Un nombre de ruta que contiene segmentos de directorio padre, por lo tanto, se resolvi\u00f3 en una ubicaci\u00f3n fuera del fileDir configurado, permitiendo que cualquiera capaz de influir en los nombres presentes en el sistema de archivos de Data Lake consumido haga que Camel cree o sobrescriba un archivo en una ubicaci\u00f3n de su elecci\u00f3n, con los privilegios del proceso de Camel. Dependiendo de d\u00f3nde pueda escribir el proceso, sobrescribir un archivo fuera del directorio de descarga puede escalar m\u00e1s all\u00e1 de la p\u00e9rdida de integridad de ese archivo. La opci\u00f3n fileDir es un par\u00e1metro de configuraci\u00f3n com\u00fan de grupo ordinario y no lleva ning\u00fan marcador de seguridad, por lo que nada indicaba a los usuarios que su valor no se estaba aplicando como un l\u00edmite de contenci\u00f3n. Otros consumidores de descarga de archivos de Camel - camel-file, camel-ftp, camel-smb, camel-mina-sftp y camel-azure-files - ya restring\u00edan sus descargas locales al directorio configurado utilizando una verificaci\u00f3n de l\u00edmite de segmento de ruta; la ruta de descarga de camel-azure-storage-datalake no estaba cubierta por ese trabajo.\n\nSe recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 4.22.0, que corrige el problema. Si los usuarios est\u00e1n en la rama de versiones LTS 4.14.x, se les sugiere actualizar a 4.14.9. Si los usuarios est\u00e1n en la rama de versiones 4.18.x, se les sugiere actualizar a 4.18.4. Para implementaciones que no pueden actualizarse inmediatamente, restrinja los nombres sobre los que actuar\u00e1 el consumidor utilizando la opci\u00f3n de endpoint regex, que se aplica a cada nombre de ruta listado como una coincidencia de cadena completa, de modo que solo se acepten nombres simples de un solo segmento y cualquier nombre que contenga un separador de ruta o un segmento de directorio padre se filtre antes de que se cree un intercambio. Alternativamente, evite la operaci\u00f3n downloadToFile en sistemas de archivos no confiables y escriba la carga \u00fatil de la ruta bajo un nombre de archivo que la propia ruta controle, en lugar de uno tomado del listado remoto. Como defensa en profundidad, trate los nombres de objetos en cualquier sistema de archivos de Data Lake escribible externamente como entrada no confiable y no derive rutas de sistema de archivos locales a partir de ellos."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-60093",
"lastModified": "2026-10-12T15:10:00.207",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-60093",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-25T19:35:53.944827Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-24T17:17:29.783",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-60093.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/24/8"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-23"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.