FKIE_CVE-2026-53155
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-25 09:16 - Updated: 2026-06-30 14:44
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/huge_memory: use correct flags for device private PMD entry
Commit 65edfda6f3f2 ("mm/rmap: extend rmap and migration support
device-private entries") updated set_pmd_migration_entry() to use
pmdp_huge_get_and_clear() in the softleaf case, but made no further
adjustments to the function itself.
Therefore this function continues to incorrectly use pmd_write(),
pmd_soft_dirty() and pmd_uffd_wp() to determine whether the installed
migration entry should be marked writable, softdirty or uffd-wp
respectively.
Whilst all are incorrect, the most problematic of these is pmd_write(), as
this can lead to corrupted rmap state.
On x86-64 _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY is aliased to _PAGE_RW. So calling
pmd_write() on a softleaf will return the softdirty state encoded in the
entry, assuming CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY was enabled.
This was observed when running the hmm.hmm_device_private.anon_write_child
selftest:
1. The test faults in a range then migrates it such that a device-private
THP range is established.
2. The parent then migrates it to a device-private writable PMD entry whose
folio is entirely AnonExclusive with entire_mapcount=1, softdirty set
(accidentally correct write state).
3. The parent forks and the PMD entries are set to device-private read only
entries, entire_mapcount=2, softdirty still set.
4. [BUG] The child writes to the range then migrates to RAM - intending to
install non-writable migration entries - but replacing parent and child
PMD mappings with WRITABLE entries due to misinterpreting the softdirty
bit.
5. In remove_migration_pmd(), if !softleaf_is_migration_read(entry) we
set the RMAP_EXCLUSIVE flag when calling folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd() for
both parent and child, which are therefore AnonExclusive.
6. [SPLAT] Child sets migrated folio entire_mapcount=1, parent sets
entire_mapcount=2 and we end up with an AnonExclusive folio with
entire_mapcount=2! Assert fires in __folio_add_anon_rmap():
VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio) &&
folio_entire_mapcount(folio) > 1 &&
PageAnonExclusive(cur_page), folio)
This patch fixes the issue by correctly referencing the softleaf entry
fields for writable, softdirty and uffd-wp in set_pmd_migration_entry().
It also only updates A/D flags if the entry is present as these are
otherwise not meaningful for a softleaf entry.
This patch also flips the if (!present) { ... } else { ... } logic in
set_pmd_migration_entry() so it is easier to understand, and adds some
comments to make things clearer.
I was able to bisect this to commit 775465fd26a3 ("lib/test_hmm: add zone
device private THP test infrastructure") which first exposes this bug as
it was the commit that permitted test_hmm to generate the test.
However commit 65edfda6f3f2 ("mm/rmap: extend rmap and migration support
device-private entries") is the commit that actually enabled this
behaviour.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"mm/huge_memory.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d7251c8d3f7cea76543abac6cf4ed15582c10846",
"status": "affected",
"version": "65edfda6f3f2e58f757485a056e4f1775a1404a8",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "43e7f189769c512c843184a8a5892ac779a6bd90",
"status": "affected",
"version": "65edfda6f3f2e58f757485a056e4f1775a1404a8",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"mm/huge_memory.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.19"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.19",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/huge_memory: use correct flags for device private PMD entry\n\nCommit 65edfda6f3f2 (\"mm/rmap: extend rmap and migration support\ndevice-private entries\") updated set_pmd_migration_entry() to use\npmdp_huge_get_and_clear() in the softleaf case, but made no further\nadjustments to the function itself.\n\nTherefore this function continues to incorrectly use pmd_write(),\npmd_soft_dirty() and pmd_uffd_wp() to determine whether the installed\nmigration entry should be marked writable, softdirty or uffd-wp\nrespectively.\n\nWhilst all are incorrect, the most problematic of these is pmd_write(), as\nthis can lead to corrupted rmap state.\n\nOn x86-64 _PAGE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY is aliased to _PAGE_RW. So calling\npmd_write() on a softleaf will return the softdirty state encoded in the\nentry, assuming CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY was enabled.\n\nThis was observed when running the hmm.hmm_device_private.anon_write_child\nselftest:\n\n1. The test faults in a range then migrates it such that a device-private\n THP range is established.\n\n2. The parent then migrates it to a device-private writable PMD entry whose\n folio is entirely AnonExclusive with entire_mapcount=1, softdirty set\n (accidentally correct write state).\n\n3. The parent forks and the PMD entries are set to device-private read only\n entries, entire_mapcount=2, softdirty still set.\n\n4. [BUG] The child writes to the range then migrates to RAM - intending to\n install non-writable migration entries - but replacing parent and child\n PMD mappings with WRITABLE entries due to misinterpreting the softdirty\n bit.\n\n5. In remove_migration_pmd(), if !softleaf_is_migration_read(entry) we\n set the RMAP_EXCLUSIVE flag when calling folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd() for\n both parent and child, which are therefore AnonExclusive.\n\n6. [SPLAT] Child sets migrated folio entire_mapcount=1, parent sets\n entire_mapcount=2 and we end up with an AnonExclusive folio with\n entire_mapcount=2! Assert fires in __folio_add_anon_rmap():\n\n\t\tVM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio) \u0026\u0026\n\t\t\t\t folio_entire_mapcount(folio) \u003e 1 \u0026\u0026\n\t\t\t\t PageAnonExclusive(cur_page), folio)\n\nThis patch fixes the issue by correctly referencing the softleaf entry\nfields for writable, softdirty and uffd-wp in set_pmd_migration_entry().\n\nIt also only updates A/D flags if the entry is present as these are\notherwise not meaningful for a softleaf entry.\n\nThis patch also flips the if (!present) { ... } else { ... } logic in\nset_pmd_migration_entry() so it is easier to understand, and adds some\ncomments to make things clearer.\n\nI was able to bisect this to commit 775465fd26a3 (\"lib/test_hmm: add zone\ndevice private THP test infrastructure\") which first exposes this bug as\nit was the commit that permitted test_hmm to generate the test.\n\nHowever commit 65edfda6f3f2 (\"mm/rmap: extend rmap and migration support\ndevice-private entries\") is the commit that actually enabled this\nbehaviour."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-53155",
"lastModified": "2026-06-30T14:44:27.313",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-06-25T09:16:32.877",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43e7f189769c512c843184a8a5892ac779a6bd90"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7251c8d3f7cea76543abac6cf4ed15582c10846"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…