FKIE_CVE-2026-50734

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-30 11:16 - Updated: 2026-06-30 14:10
Severity
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Client, Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ All. An unauthenticated network attacker can cause a broker DoS by sending a crafted WireFormatInfo frame with a malicious large size value. The value is not validate and causes the broker to attempt allocation during pre-auth negotiation which can trigger OOM and crash the broker. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Client: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.7 or 5.19.8, which fixes the issue.
References
security@apache.orghttps://lists.apache.org/thread/nxso951fnvf72qf9m475mpz4yf931xk0
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/29/10
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "org.apache.activemq:activemq-client",
          "product": "Apache ActiveMQ Client",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "5.19.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6.2.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "org.apache.activemq:apache-activemq",
          "product": "Apache ActiveMQ",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "5.19.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6.2.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "org.apache.activemq:activemq-all",
          "product": "Apache ActiveMQ All",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "5.19.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6.2.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Client, Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ All.\n\nAn unauthenticated network attacker can cause a broker DoS by sending a crafted WireFormatInfo frame with a malicious large size value. The value is not validate and causes the broker to attempt allocation during pre-auth negotiation which can trigger OOM and crash the broker.\nThis issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Client: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.8, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.7.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.7 or 5.19.8, which fixes the issue."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-50734",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-30T14:10:09.760",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-50734",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-30T12:32:21.060414Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-06-30T11:16:29.827",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/nxso951fnvf72qf9m475mpz4yf931xk0"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/29/10"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-789"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@apache.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.