FKIE_CVE-2026-47721
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-08-18 20:17 - Updated: 2026-10-22 22:10| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "FUXA",
"vendor": "frangoteam",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.3.2"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Prior to 1.3.2, POST /api/scheduler and DELETE /api/scheduler in server/api/scheduler/index.js do not consistently enforce authJwt.haveAdminPermission for scheduler settings. An authenticated non-admin operator can create or alter deviceActions that invoke onSetValue or onRunScript, or delete schedules, gaining access to device-value changes and server-side project script execution normally reserved for administrators. Scheduled and repeating actions can continue changing PLC setpoints, safety interlocks, device state, or project data after the operator\u0027s session ends. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.2."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "FUXA es un software de visualizaci\u00f3n de procesos (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) basado en web. Antes de la 1.3.2, POST /API/scheduler y DELETE /API/scheduler en servidor/API/scheduler/index.js no aplican consistentemente authJwt.haveAdminPermission para los ajustes del programador. Un operador autenticado no administrador puede crear o modificar deviceActions que invocan onSetValue o onRunScript, o eliminar programaciones, obteniendo acceso a cambios en los valores de los dispositivos y a la ejecuci\u00f3n de scripts de proyecto del lado del servidor normalmente reservada para administradores. Las acciones programadas y repetitivas pueden seguir cambiando puntos de ajuste de PLC, enclavamientos de seguridad, el estado del dispositivo o datos del proyecto despu\u00e9s de que finalice la sesi\u00f3n del operador. Este problema se ha solucionado en la versi\u00f3n 1.3.2."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-47721",
"lastModified": "2026-10-22T22:10:00.250",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.4,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-47721",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-19T15:21:25.802999Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-18T20:17:15.383",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/3c945a03f9942fd45a793ab7e3c2d1f1b15b93bf"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2345"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.2"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-8ghr-w65f-j3qr"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-862"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.