FKIE_CVE-2026-46526
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-28 19:16 - Updated: 2026-06-01 18:43
Severity
Summary
Local Deep Research is an AI-powered research assistant for deep, iterative research. Prior to 1.6.10, the URL checking logic in local-deep-research has a logical flaw that could be bypassed by attackers, leading to SSRF attacks. The current project uses validate_url to validate the input URL. The main logic is to perform security checks on the host portion of the URL extracted by urlparse to prevent SSRF attacks. However, there are indeed differences in parsing between urlparse and the library that actually sends the request. For example, in safe_get, validate_url is first used to perform an SSRF check, and then requests.get is used to send the actual request. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.10.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Local Deep Research is an AI-powered research assistant for deep, iterative research. Prior to 1.6.10, the URL checking logic in local-deep-research has a logical flaw that could be bypassed by attackers, leading to SSRF attacks. The current project uses validate_url to validate the input URL. The main logic is to perform security checks on the host portion of the URL extracted by urlparse to prevent SSRF attacks. However, there are indeed differences in parsing between urlparse and the library that actually sends the request. For example, in safe_get, validate_url is first used to perform an SSRF check, and then requests.get is used to send the actual request. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.10."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-46526",
"lastModified": "2026-06-01T18:43:56.377",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-05-28T19:16:39.430",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/LearningCircuit/local-deep-research/pull/3873"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/LearningCircuit/local-deep-research/pull/3882"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/LearningCircuit/local-deep-research/pull/3889"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/LearningCircuit/local-deep-research/pull/3932"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/LearningCircuit/local-deep-research/releases/tag/v1.6.10"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/LearningCircuit/local-deep-research/security/advisories/GHSA-g23j-2vwm-5c25"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/LearningCircuit/local-deep-research/security/advisories/GHSA-g23j-2vwm-5c25"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…