FKIE_CVE-2026-46196
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-28 10:16 - Updated: 2026-05-28 13:44
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracepoint: balance regfunc() on func_add() failure in tracepoint_add_func()
When a tracepoint goes through the 0 -> 1 transition, tracepoint_add_func()
invokes the subsystem's ext->regfunc() before attempting to install the
new probe via func_add(). If func_add() then fails (for example, when
allocate_probes() cannot allocate a new probe array under memory pressure
and returns -ENOMEM), the function returns the error without calling the
matching ext->unregfunc(), leaving the side effects of regfunc() behind
with no installed probe to justify them.
For syscall tracepoints this is particularly unpleasant: syscall_regfunc()
bumps sys_tracepoint_refcount and sets SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT on every task.
After a leaked failure, the refcount is stuck at a non-zero value with no
consumer, and every task continues paying the syscall trace entry/exit
overhead until reboot. Other subsystems providing regfunc()/unregfunc()
pairs exhibit similarly scoped persistent state.
Mirror the existing 1 -> 0 cleanup and call ext->unregfunc() in the
func_add() error path, gated on the same condition used there so the
unwind is symmetric with the registration.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntracepoint: balance regfunc() on func_add() failure in tracepoint_add_func()\n\nWhen a tracepoint goes through the 0 -\u003e 1 transition, tracepoint_add_func()\ninvokes the subsystem\u0027s ext-\u003eregfunc() before attempting to install the\nnew probe via func_add(). If func_add() then fails (for example, when\nallocate_probes() cannot allocate a new probe array under memory pressure\nand returns -ENOMEM), the function returns the error without calling the\nmatching ext-\u003eunregfunc(), leaving the side effects of regfunc() behind\nwith no installed probe to justify them.\n\nFor syscall tracepoints this is particularly unpleasant: syscall_regfunc()\nbumps sys_tracepoint_refcount and sets SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT on every task.\nAfter a leaked failure, the refcount is stuck at a non-zero value with no\nconsumer, and every task continues paying the syscall trace entry/exit\noverhead until reboot. Other subsystems providing regfunc()/unregfunc()\npairs exhibit similarly scoped persistent state.\n\nMirror the existing 1 -\u003e 0 cleanup and call ext-\u003eunregfunc() in the\nfunc_add() error path, gated on the same condition used there so the\nunwind is symmetric with the registration."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-46196",
"lastModified": "2026-05-28T13:44:01.663",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-05-28T10:16:35.253",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/247ed8a969f981bfba3112fd4bb441eaa6cef59c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c5b8eeea006eb694c81631cd5713d494b80be90"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/342829e042ac00f3d68d442ea92873fb6683f494"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bcadb3c2bc1cf60690e931aadd35fb7bd646a49"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fad217e16fded7f3c09f8637b0f6a224d58b5f2e"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…