FKIE_CVE-2026-46194
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-28 10:16 - Updated: 2026-05-28 13:44
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix node_cnt race between extent node destroy and writeback
f2fs_destroy_extent_node() does not set FI_NO_EXTENT before clearing
extent nodes. When called from f2fs_drop_inode() with I_SYNC set,
concurrent kworker writeback can insert new extent nodes into the same
extent tree, racing with the destroy and triggering f2fs_bug_on() in
__destroy_extent_node(). The scenario is as follows:
drop inode writeback
- iput
- f2fs_drop_inode // I_SYNC set
- f2fs_destroy_extent_node
- __destroy_extent_node
- while (node_cnt) {
write_lock(&et->lock)
__free_extent_tree
write_unlock(&et->lock)
- __writeback_single_inode
- f2fs_outplace_write_data
- f2fs_update_read_extent_cache
- __update_extent_tree_range
// FI_NO_EXTENT not set,
// insert new extent node
} // node_cnt == 0, exit while
- f2fs_bug_on(node_cnt) // node_cnt > 0
Additionally, __update_extent_tree_range() only checks FI_NO_EXTENT for
EX_READ type, leaving EX_BLOCK_AGE updates completely unprotected.
This patch set FI_NO_EXTENT under et->lock in __destroy_extent_node(),
consistent with other callers (__update_extent_tree_range and
__drop_extent_tree) and check FI_NO_EXTENT for both EX_READ and
EX_BLOCK_AGE tree.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix node_cnt race between extent node destroy and writeback\n\nf2fs_destroy_extent_node() does not set FI_NO_EXTENT before clearing\nextent nodes. When called from f2fs_drop_inode() with I_SYNC set,\nconcurrent kworker writeback can insert new extent nodes into the same\nextent tree, racing with the destroy and triggering f2fs_bug_on() in\n__destroy_extent_node(). The scenario is as follows:\n\ndrop inode writeback\n - iput\n - f2fs_drop_inode // I_SYNC set\n - f2fs_destroy_extent_node\n - __destroy_extent_node\n - while (node_cnt) {\n write_lock(\u0026et-\u003elock)\n __free_extent_tree\n write_unlock(\u0026et-\u003elock)\n - __writeback_single_inode\n - f2fs_outplace_write_data\n - f2fs_update_read_extent_cache\n - __update_extent_tree_range\n // FI_NO_EXTENT not set,\n // insert new extent node\n } // node_cnt == 0, exit while\n - f2fs_bug_on(node_cnt) // node_cnt \u003e 0\n\nAdditionally, __update_extent_tree_range() only checks FI_NO_EXTENT for\nEX_READ type, leaving EX_BLOCK_AGE updates completely unprotected.\n\nThis patch set FI_NO_EXTENT under et-\u003elock in __destroy_extent_node(),\nconsistent with other callers (__update_extent_tree_range and\n__drop_extent_tree) and check FI_NO_EXTENT for both EX_READ and\nEX_BLOCK_AGE tree."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-46194",
"lastModified": "2026-05-28T13:44:01.663",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-05-28T10:16:35.033",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0559a0e962aacbb47519e26ee663be04b72dcb92"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/42dd1c91f993431d0b399502479d00e6ad1bca71"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab1eaf9d5c99042f5b0243bf67a06283a4c0757f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0e4395870eb3441ddc959f6710b5f6ca61aff26"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed78aeebef05212ef7dca93bd931e4eff67c113f"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…