FKIE_CVE-2026-46173
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-28 10:16 - Updated: 2026-05-28 13:44
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exit: prevent preemption of oopsing TASK_DEAD task
When an already-exiting task oopses, make_task_dead() currently calls
do_task_dead() with preemption enabled. That is forbidden:
do_task_dead() calls __schedule(), which has a comment saying "WARNING:
must be called with preemption disabled!".
If an oopsing task is preempted in do_task_dead(), between becoming
TASK_DEAD and entering the scheduler explicitly, bad things happen:
finish_task_switch() assumes that once the scheduler has switched away
from a TASK_DEAD task, the task can never run again and its stack is no
longer needed; but that assumption apparently doesn't hold if the dead
task was preempted (the SM_PREEMPT case).
This means that the scheduler ends up repeatedly dropping references on
the dead task's stack, which can lead to use-after-free or double-free
of the entire task stack; in other words, two tasks can end up running
on the same stack, resulting in various kinds of memory corruption.
(This does not just affect "recursively oopsing" tasks; it is enough to
oops once during task exit, for example in a file_operations::release
handler)
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nexit: prevent preemption of oopsing TASK_DEAD task\n\nWhen an already-exiting task oopses, make_task_dead() currently calls\ndo_task_dead() with preemption enabled. That is forbidden:\ndo_task_dead() calls __schedule(), which has a comment saying \"WARNING:\nmust be called with preemption disabled!\".\n\nIf an oopsing task is preempted in do_task_dead(), between becoming\nTASK_DEAD and entering the scheduler explicitly, bad things happen:\nfinish_task_switch() assumes that once the scheduler has switched away\nfrom a TASK_DEAD task, the task can never run again and its stack is no\nlonger needed; but that assumption apparently doesn\u0027t hold if the dead\ntask was preempted (the SM_PREEMPT case).\n\nThis means that the scheduler ends up repeatedly dropping references on\nthe dead task\u0027s stack, which can lead to use-after-free or double-free\nof the entire task stack; in other words, two tasks can end up running\non the same stack, resulting in various kinds of memory corruption.\n\n(This does not just affect \"recursively oopsing\" tasks; it is enough to\noops once during task exit, for example in a file_operations::release\nhandler)"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-46173",
"lastModified": "2026-05-28T13:44:01.663",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-05-28T10:16:32.923",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/640b4c00fb0e2920327435f6176cbefc3c546165"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f49f94f3b11fe8bff1bf2a054143789e76aaf17"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b2800ba5f5f77a8ee7f4cbadb19cf1264597a34"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9756b3db5db6c2f5eccb32dddbd88eb4c54f575e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c1fa0bb633e4a6b11e83ffc57fa5abe8ebb87891"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…