FKIE_CVE-2026-46106
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-28 10:16 - Updated: 2026-05-28 13:44
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
eventfs: Hold eventfs_mutex and SRCU when remount walks events
Commit 340f0c7067a9 ("eventfs: Update all the eventfs_inodes from the
events descriptor") had eventfs_set_attrs() recurse through ei->children
on remount. The walk only holds the rcu_read_lock() taken by
tracefs_apply_options() over tracefs_inodes, which is wrong:
- list_for_each_entry over ei->children races with the list_del_rcu()
in eventfs_remove_rec() -- LIST_POISON1 deref, same shape as
d2603279c7d6.
- eventfs_inodes are freed via call_srcu(&eventfs_srcu, ...).
rcu_read_lock() does not extend an SRCU grace period, so ti->private
can be reclaimed under the walk.
- The writes to ei->attr race with eventfs_set_attr(), which holds
eventfs_mutex.
Reproducer:
while :; do mount -o remount,uid=$((RANDOM%1000)) /sys/kernel/tracing; done &
while :; do
echo "p:kp submit_bio" > /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events
echo > /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events
done
Wrap the events portion of tracefs_apply_options() in
eventfs_remount_lock()/_unlock() that take eventfs_mutex and
srcu_read_lock(&eventfs_srcu). eventfs_set_attrs() doesn't sleep so the
nested rcu_read_lock() is fine; lockdep_assert_held() pins the contract.
Comment in tracefs_drop_inode() said "RCU cycle" -- it is SRCU.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\neventfs: Hold eventfs_mutex and SRCU when remount walks events\n\nCommit 340f0c7067a9 (\"eventfs: Update all the eventfs_inodes from the\nevents descriptor\") had eventfs_set_attrs() recurse through ei-\u003echildren\non remount. The walk only holds the rcu_read_lock() taken by\ntracefs_apply_options() over tracefs_inodes, which is wrong:\n\n - list_for_each_entry over ei-\u003echildren races with the list_del_rcu()\n in eventfs_remove_rec() -- LIST_POISON1 deref, same shape as\n d2603279c7d6.\n - eventfs_inodes are freed via call_srcu(\u0026eventfs_srcu, ...).\n rcu_read_lock() does not extend an SRCU grace period, so ti-\u003eprivate\n can be reclaimed under the walk.\n - The writes to ei-\u003eattr race with eventfs_set_attr(), which holds\n eventfs_mutex.\n\nReproducer:\n\n while :; do mount -o remount,uid=$((RANDOM%1000)) /sys/kernel/tracing; done \u0026\n while :; do\n echo \"p:kp submit_bio\" \u003e /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events\n echo \u003e /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events\n done\n\nWrap the events portion of tracefs_apply_options() in\neventfs_remount_lock()/_unlock() that take eventfs_mutex and\nsrcu_read_lock(\u0026eventfs_srcu). eventfs_set_attrs() doesn\u0027t sleep so the\nnested rcu_read_lock() is fine; lockdep_assert_held() pins the contract.\n\nComment in tracefs_drop_inode() said \"RCU cycle\" -- it is SRCU."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-46106",
"lastModified": "2026-05-28T13:44:01.663",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-05-28T10:16:25.950",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07004a8c4b572171934390148ee48c4175c77eed"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44e64d8a432837308f4dda3ffe819f1ec092a0ba"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52b109f1b875b912d4ab2c5fdd8c322d47119d9b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae9cd0b46b1890040006a2fc5e905c5d6053fd02"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed2ad73bcb0a7a6cc934097d4853b6d5124c317e"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…