FKIE_CVE-2026-45892
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-27 14:17 - Updated: 2026-05-27 14:48
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout
When splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to
initialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and
EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent.
Assume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it
without dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written
extent.
0 A B N
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data
|<- ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized
ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with
EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but
ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack
of space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten.
0 A B N
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed data
ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with
EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and
leave an written extent from A to N.
0 A B N
[UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ]
Finally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent
status tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree.
0 A B N
[UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ]
Fix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out
the second part.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout\n\nWhen splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to\ninitialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent.\n\nAssume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it\nwithout dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written\nextent.\n\n 0 A B N\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n [--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data\n |\u003c- -\u003e| ----\u003e this range needs to be initialized\n\next4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but\next4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack\nof space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten.\n\n 0 A B N\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n [--DDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed data\n\next4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and\nleave an written extent from A to N.\n\n 0 A B N\n [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n [--DDDDDDDDZZ]\n\nFinally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent\nstatus tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree.\n\n 0 A B N\n [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent\n [UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree\n [--DDDDDDDDZZ]\n\nFix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out\nthe second part."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-45892",
"lastModified": "2026-05-27T14:48:31.480",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-05-27T14:17:03.353",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d882ea3b0931b43530d44149b79fcd4ffc13030"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1b962a821e7a52d48212ae269b45808b4411267"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2ee51d684adca7645e4aa74adca13f6750390bc"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8ee559fccdef713f058cfe5f2c03dc9b18be3b1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0931a5c17005a0c4fc35bd1a001245effc3354b"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…