FKIE_CVE-2026-45892

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-27 14:17 - Updated: 2026-05-27 14:48
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout When splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to initialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent. Assume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it without dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written extent. 0 A B N [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree [--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data |<- ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack of space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten. 0 A B N [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree [--DDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed data ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and leave an written extent from A to N. 0 A B N [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree [--DDDDDDDDZZ] Finally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent status tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree. 0 A B N [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent [UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree [--DDDDDDDDZZ] Fix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out the second part.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout\n\nWhen splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to\ninitialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent.\n\nAssume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it\nwithout dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written\nextent.\n\n       0  A      B  N\n       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent      U: unwritten extent\n       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n       [--DDDDDDDD--]                     D: valid data\n          |\u003c-  -\u003e| ----\u003e this range needs to be initialized\n\next4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but\next4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack\nof space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten.\n\n       0  A      B  N\n       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent\n       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n       [--DDDDDDDDZZ]                     Z: zeroed data\n\next4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and\nleave an written extent from A to N.\n\n       0  A      B  N\n       [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent      W: written extent\n       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n       [--DDDDDDDDZZ]\n\nFinally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent\nstatus tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree.\n\n       0  A      B  N\n       [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent      W: written extent\n       [UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree\n       [--DDDDDDDDZZ]\n\nFix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out\nthe second part."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-45892",
  "lastModified": "2026-05-27T14:48:31.480",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2026-05-27T14:17:03.353",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d882ea3b0931b43530d44149b79fcd4ffc13030"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1b962a821e7a52d48212ae269b45808b4411267"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2ee51d684adca7645e4aa74adca13f6750390bc"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8ee559fccdef713f058cfe5f2c03dc9b18be3b1"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0931a5c17005a0c4fc35bd1a001245effc3354b"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…