FKIE_CVE-2026-44748

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-09 01:16 - Updated: 2026-07-23 08:10
Summary
SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an authenticated attacker with normal privileges to obtain a valid signed message and send modified signed XML documents to the verifier. This may result in acceptance of tampered identity information leading to unauthorized access to sensitive user data and potential disruption of normal system usage. This causes a high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform",
          "vendor": "SAP_SE",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 702"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 731"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 740"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 750"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 751"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 752"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 753"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 754"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 755"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 756"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 757"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 758"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 816"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 918"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "SAP_BASIS 919"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cna@sap.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an authenticated attacker with normal privileges to obtain a valid signed message and send modified signed XML documents to the verifier. This may result in acceptance of tampered identity information leading to unauthorized access to sensitive user data and potential disruption of normal system usage. This causes a high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "SAP NetWeaver Servidor de Aplicaciones ABAP y Plataforma ABAP permite a un atacante autenticado con privilegios normales obtener un mensaje firmado v\u00e1lido y enviar documentos XML firmados modificados al verificador. Esto puede resultar en la aceptaci\u00f3n de informaci\u00f3n de identidad manipulada, lo que lleva a un acceso no autorizado a datos de usuario sensibles y una posible interrupci\u00f3n del uso normal del sistema. Esto causa un alto impacto en la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad de la aplicaci\u00f3n."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-44748",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-23T08:10:00.137",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.9,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
        "impactScore": 6.0,
        "source": "cna@sap.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-44748",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-09T03:56:21.667756Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-06-09T01:16:46.603",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3746332"
    },
    {
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cna@sap.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-347"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.