FKIE_CVE-2026-44209

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-26 21:16 - Updated: 2026-07-24 13:18
Summary
Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a template language that makes sense. Prior to 2.4.2, banks uses jinja2.Environment() (unsandboxed) to render prompt templates. Applications that pass user-supplied strings as the template argument to Prompt() are vulnerable to Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI), which can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the host system. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.2.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "banks",
          "vendor": "masci",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 2.4.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
    },
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:exploit_intelligence:0"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "exploit-intelligence-tech-preview/vulnerability-analysis-rhel9",
          "product": "Exploit Intelligence",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-ocp-rag-rhel9",
          "product": "OpenShift Lightspeed",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-service-api-rhel9",
          "product": "OpenShift Lightspeed",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "openshift-lightspeed-tech-preview/lightspeed-rag-tool-rhel9",
          "product": "OpenShift Lightspeed",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel8",
          "product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
          "vendor": "Red Hat"
        }
      ],
      "source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a template language that makes sense. Prior to 2.4.2, banks uses jinja2.Environment() (unsandboxed) to render prompt templates. Applications that pass user-supplied strings as the template argument to Prompt() are vulnerable to Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI), which can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the host system. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.2."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Banks genera prompts de LLM significativos utilizando un lenguaje de plantillas que tiene sentido. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 2.4.2, Banks utiliza jinja2.Environment() (sin sandbox) para renderizar plantillas de prompts. Las aplicaciones que pasan cadenas proporcionadas por el usuario como argumento de plantilla a Prompt() son vulnerables a la Inyecci\u00f3n de Plantillas del Lado del Servidor (SSTI), lo que puede conducir a la Ejecuci\u00f3n Remota de C\u00f3digo (RCE) en el sistema anfitri\u00f3n. Esta vulnerabilidad est\u00e1 corregida en la versi\u00f3n 2.4.2."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-44209",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-24T13:18:22.047",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-44209",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-05-28T14:07:18.330651Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-26T21:16:37.620",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/74"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-gphh-9q3h-jgpp"
    },
    {
      "source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44209"
    },
    {
      "source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481713"
    },
    {
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-gphh-9q3h-jgpp"
    },
    {
      "source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44209.json"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-1336"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-917"
        }
      ],
      "source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…