FKIE_CVE-2026-43404
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-08 15:16 - Updated: 2026-05-21 19:21
Severity
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem
If hmm_range_fault() fails a folio_trylock() in do_swap_page,
trying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration,
to ram, the function will spin until it succeeds grabbing the lock.
However, if the process holding the lock is depending on a work
item to be completed, which is scheduled on the same CPU as the
spinning hmm_range_fault(), that work item might be starved and
we end up in a livelock / starvation situation which is never
resolved.
This can happen, for example if the process holding the
device-private folio lock is stuck in
migrate_device_unmap()->lru_add_drain_all()
sinc lru_add_drain_all() requires a short work-item
to be run on all online cpus to complete.
A prerequisite for this to happen is:
a) Both zone device and system memory folios are considered in
migrate_device_unmap(), so that there is a reason to call
lru_add_drain_all() for a system memory folio while a
folio lock is held on a zone device folio.
b) The zone device folio has an initial mapcount > 1 which causes
at least one migration PTE entry insertion to be deferred to
try_to_migrate(), which can happen after the call to
lru_add_drain_all().
c) No or voluntary only preemption.
This all seems pretty unlikely to happen, but indeed is hit by
the "xe_exec_system_allocator" igt test.
Resolve this by waiting for the folio to be unlocked if the
folio_trylock() fails in do_swap_page().
Rename migration_entry_wait_on_locked() to
softleaf_entry_wait_unlock() and update its documentation to
indicate the new use-case.
Future code improvements might consider moving
the lru_add_drain_all() call in migrate_device_unmap() to be
called *after* all pages have migration entries inserted.
That would eliminate also b) above.
v2:
- Instead of a cond_resched() in hmm_range_fault(),
eliminate the problem by waiting for the folio to be unlocked
in do_swap_page() (Alistair Popple, Andrew Morton)
v3:
- Add a stub migration_entry_wait_on_locked() for the
!CONFIG_MIGRATION case. (Kernel Test Robot)
v4:
- Rename migrate_entry_wait_on_locked() to
softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and update docs (Alistair Popple)
v5:
- Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION
version of softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
- Modify wording around function names in the commit message
(Andrew Morton)
(cherry picked from commit a69d1ab971a624c6f112cea61536569d579c3215)
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D6461E17-9936-4679-8F97-568871A6FBE4",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.19",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E825E7C3-FEAC-4FD3-8A81-78D7387948C9",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem\n\nIf hmm_range_fault() fails a folio_trylock() in do_swap_page,\ntrying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration,\nto ram, the function will spin until it succeeds grabbing the lock.\n\nHowever, if the process holding the lock is depending on a work\nitem to be completed, which is scheduled on the same CPU as the\nspinning hmm_range_fault(), that work item might be starved and\nwe end up in a livelock / starvation situation which is never\nresolved.\n\nThis can happen, for example if the process holding the\ndevice-private folio lock is stuck in\n migrate_device_unmap()-\u003elru_add_drain_all()\nsinc lru_add_drain_all() requires a short work-item\nto be run on all online cpus to complete.\n\nA prerequisite for this to happen is:\na) Both zone device and system memory folios are considered in\n migrate_device_unmap(), so that there is a reason to call\n lru_add_drain_all() for a system memory folio while a\n folio lock is held on a zone device folio.\nb) The zone device folio has an initial mapcount \u003e 1 which causes\n at least one migration PTE entry insertion to be deferred to\n try_to_migrate(), which can happen after the call to\n lru_add_drain_all().\nc) No or voluntary only preemption.\n\nThis all seems pretty unlikely to happen, but indeed is hit by\nthe \"xe_exec_system_allocator\" igt test.\n\nResolve this by waiting for the folio to be unlocked if the\nfolio_trylock() fails in do_swap_page().\n\nRename migration_entry_wait_on_locked() to\nsoftleaf_entry_wait_unlock() and update its documentation to\nindicate the new use-case.\n\nFuture code improvements might consider moving\nthe lru_add_drain_all() call in migrate_device_unmap() to be\ncalled *after* all pages have migration entries inserted.\nThat would eliminate also b) above.\n\nv2:\n- Instead of a cond_resched() in hmm_range_fault(),\n eliminate the problem by waiting for the folio to be unlocked\n in do_swap_page() (Alistair Popple, Andrew Morton)\nv3:\n- Add a stub migration_entry_wait_on_locked() for the\n !CONFIG_MIGRATION case. (Kernel Test Robot)\nv4:\n- Rename migrate_entry_wait_on_locked() to\n softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and update docs (Alistair Popple)\nv5:\n- Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION\n version of softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().\n- Modify wording around function names in the commit message\n (Andrew Morton)\n\n(cherry picked from commit a69d1ab971a624c6f112cea61536569d579c3215)"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-43404",
"lastModified": "2026-05-21T19:21:22.460",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-05-08T15:16:51.887",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e6e2fc91d4b9b12ec6e137019532568ebcf2680"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94b6d0ba4b640ba23bb6c708a59316e74e5ede63"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b570f37a2ce480be26c665345c5514686a8a0274"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-667"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…