FKIE_CVE-2026-43214
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-06 12:16 - Updated: 2026-05-11 19:44
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: Add SRCU protection for reading PDPTRs in __get_sregs2()
Add SRCU read-side protection when reading PDPTR registers in
__get_sregs2().
Reading PDPTRs may trigger access to guest memory:
kvm_pdptr_read() -> svm_cache_reg() -> load_pdptrs() ->
kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page() -> kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot()
kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot() dereferences memslots via __kvm_memslots(),
which uses srcu_dereference_check() and requires either kvm->srcu or
kvm->slots_lock to be held. Currently only vcpu->mutex is held,
triggering lockdep warning:
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot
6.12.59+ #3 Not tainted
include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by syz.5.1717/15100:
#0: ff1100002f4b00b0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x1d5/0x1590
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xf0/0x120 lib/dump_stack.c:120
lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x1e3/0x270 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6824
__kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 [inline]
__kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1059 [inline]
kvm_vcpu_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1076 [inline]
kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x518/0x5e0 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:2617
kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x27/0x50 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3302
load_pdptrs+0xff/0x4b0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1065
svm_cache_reg+0x1c9/0x230 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c:1688
kvm_pdptr_read arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h:141 [inline]
__get_sregs2 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11784 [inline]
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x3e20/0x4aa0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:6279
kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x856/0x1590 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4663
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:893 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x18b/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:893
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xbd/0x1d0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2EECFDDC-11D6-4155-8F3B-061E8A2F6700",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.165",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "851E9353-6C09-4CC9-877E-E09DB164A3C2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.128",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "BCE16369-98ED-41CF-8995-DFDC10B288D2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.75",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B4B8CDA9-BADF-4CF5-8B3B-702DE8EEA40B",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "373EEEDA-FAA1-4FB4-B6ED-DB4DD99DBE67",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86: Add SRCU protection for reading PDPTRs in __get_sregs2()\n\nAdd SRCU read-side protection when reading PDPTR registers in\n__get_sregs2().\n\nReading PDPTRs may trigger access to guest memory:\nkvm_pdptr_read() -\u003e svm_cache_reg() -\u003e load_pdptrs() -\u003e\nkvm_vcpu_read_guest_page() -\u003e kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot()\n\nkvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot() dereferences memslots via __kvm_memslots(),\nwhich uses srcu_dereference_check() and requires either kvm-\u003esrcu or\nkvm-\u003eslots_lock to be held. Currently only vcpu-\u003emutex is held,\ntriggering lockdep warning:\n\n=============================\nWARNING: suspicious RCU usage in kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot\n6.12.59+ #3 Not tainted\n\ninclude/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\nrcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n1 lock held by syz.5.1717/15100:\n #0: ff1100002f4b00b0 (\u0026vcpu-\u003emutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x1d5/0x1590\n\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xf0/0x120 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x1e3/0x270 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6824\n __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1062 [inline]\n __kvm_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1059 [inline]\n kvm_vcpu_memslots include/linux/kvm_host.h:1076 [inline]\n kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x518/0x5e0 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:2617\n kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x27/0x50 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3302\n load_pdptrs+0xff/0x4b0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1065\n svm_cache_reg+0x1c9/0x230 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c:1688\n kvm_pdptr_read arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h:141 [inline]\n __get_sregs2 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11784 [inline]\n kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x3e20/0x4aa0 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:6279\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x856/0x1590 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4663\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:893 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18b/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:893\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xbd/0x1d0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-43214",
"lastModified": "2026-05-11T19:44:24.010",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-05-06T12:16:40.920",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57536ff0a6bd69a5808d682925202babdb5ddc13"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/708e20c66b2761d878a2bc3c7534e7f814e4dec5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95d848dc7e639988dbb385a8cba9b484607cf98c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f2bfea51151dfbb24b52f452eb3d5f5fe0e506e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b33f8d816950b10e7879cd8ffd7ae4b649ada4db"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f621ca24f9f489e226e22560761b04884984133b"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…