FKIE_CVE-2026-35302
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-17 10:40 - Updated: 2026-10-25 23:10| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| secalert_us@oracle.com | https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspujun2026.html | Vendor Advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| oracle | weblogic_server | 12.2.1.4.0 | |
| oracle | weblogic_server | 14.1.1.0.0 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "WebLogic Server",
"vendor": "Oracle Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.2.1.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "14.1.1.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "secalert_us@oracle.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:weblogic_server:12.2.1.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4A5BB153-68E0-4DDA-87D1-0D9AB7F0A418",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:weblogic_server:14.1.1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "04BCDC24-4A21-473C-8733-0D9CFB38A752",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Vulnerability in the WebLogic Server product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Console). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.1.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise WebLogic Server. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in WebLogic Server, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H)."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad en el producto WebLogic Server de Oracle Fusion Middleware (componente: Console). Las versiones compatibles que est\u00e1n afectadas son 12.2.1.4.0 y 14.1.1.0.0. La vulnerabilidad dif\u00edcil de explotar permite a un atacante no autenticado con acceso de red v\u00eda HTTP comprometer WebLogic Server. Los ataques exitosos requieren interacci\u00f3n humana de una persona distinta al atacante y, aunque la vulnerabilidad est\u00e1 en WebLogic Server, los ataques pueden impactar significativamente productos adicionales (cambio de alcance). Los ataques exitosos de esta vulnerabilidad pueden resultar en la toma de control de WebLogic Server. Puntuaci\u00f3n Base CVSS 3.1 de 8.3 (impactos en Confidencialidad, Integridad y Disponibilidad). Vector CVSS: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H)."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-35302",
"lastModified": "2026-10-25T23:10:00.167",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-35302",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-17T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-17T10:40:22.307",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspujun2026.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-601"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.