FKIE_CVE-2026-34913

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-23 17:16 - Updated: 2026-06-23 18:17
Severity
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
A missing access control check when linking trackers to campaigns through the campaign-trackers.php script of Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier could allow a low‑privileged user to link their trackers to campaigns owned by other managers on the same instance, resulting in inconsistent ownership relationships. Ownership validation has been added to ensure that campaigns can only be linked to trackers owned by the same advertiser.
References
support@hackerone.comhttps://hackerone.com/reports/3650582
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Adserver",
          "vendor": "Revive",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.0.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "support@hackerone.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A missing access control check when linking trackers to campaigns through the campaign-trackers.php script of Revive Adserver 6.0.6 and earlier could allow a low\u2011privileged user to link their trackers to campaigns owned by other managers on the same instance, resulting in inconsistent ownership relationships. Ownership validation has been added to ensure that campaigns can only be linked to trackers owned by the same advertiser."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-34913",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-23T18:17:43.463",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV30": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "support@hackerone.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-34913",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-23T17:22:59.326404Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-06-23T17:16:53.597",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3650582"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-284"
        }
      ],
      "source": "support@hackerone.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.