FKIE_CVE-2026-32501

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-25 17:17 - Updated: 2026-04-29 10:17
Severity ?
7.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
7.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Summary
Missing Authorization vulnerability in wp-configurator WP Configurator Pro wp-configurator-pro allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP Configurator Pro: from n/a through <= 3.7.9.
References
audit@patchstack.comhttps://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/wp-configurator-pro/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-configurator-pro-plugin-3-7-9-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in wp-configurator WP Configurator Pro wp-configurator-pro allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP Configurator Pro: from n/a through \u003c= 3.7.9."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de autorizaci\u00f3n faltante en wp-configurator WP Configurator Pro wp-configurator-pro permite explotar niveles de seguridad de control de acceso configurados incorrectamente. Este problema afecta a WP Configurator Pro: desde n/a hasta \u0026lt;= 3.7.9."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-32501",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-29T10:17:15.833",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 4.2,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 4.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-25T17:17:02.080",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/wp-configurator-pro/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-configurator-pro-plugin-3-7-9-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.